Court : Karnataka
Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ804Kant
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioner was initially appointed as temporary sub-staff in June 1972 and later on worked on probation and confirmed. On May 23, 1985 he was working as Shroff/Godown keeper in the respondent- bank at its Dasanakoppa branch. He was served with a charge sheet as per Annexure-A, accusing him of not accounting for a sum of Rs. 600/- which was paid to him by one Mr. Guttappa, sub-staff. The amount was paid towards Recurring Deposit instalment on behalf of one A.S. Bhusanurmath and he did not make necessary entries in the accounts of the bank. Similarly, he was also accused of misappropriating IRDP Small Loan in a sum of Rs. 1000/- granted to one Karimsab Madarsab Eligar by drawing the money from his account. In the charge sheet, the particulars of the allegations are clearly set out. Subsequently, on August 9, 1986 an amendment was made to the charge sheet accusing him of forgery of withdrawal slip dated February 25, 1985 on the basis of which the amount was withdra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : [1991(62)FLR376]; ILR1990KAR550; (1991)IILLJ217Kant
ORDER1. Both these petitions relate to the same subject matter. Therefore, they are heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 2. The petitioner in W.P. No. 1836/89 joined service under the 1st respondent on 7th September, 1957 as a Research Assistant in the Oriental Research Institute of the 1st respondent. Initially he was appointed temporarily but his services subsequently came to be terminated and he was appointed regularly as Research Assistant Class II with effect from 1st June 1965 and thereafter he was promoted as Research Assistant Class-I. 3. The petitioner in W.P. No. 12317/89 was appointed as Research Assistant Class II on 1st June, 1965, under the 1st respondent to work in the Oriental research Institute. Thereafter he was promoted as Research Assistant Class-I in the Institute of Kannada Studies as the Oriental Research Institute came to be bifurcated into two. 4. On 21st January, 1975 the Syndicate of the Mysore University passed a Resolution as per Annexur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1985KAR2337
Venkatachaliah, J.1. This appeal is in the list of orders cases for the day on the Respondent's application I.A. IV, for early hearing. However, with the consent of Learned Counsel on both the sides the appeal is taken up for final hearing, heard and disposed of by this Judgment.This appeal, by the owner of the motor-vehicle and the Insurer, is directed against the award dated 14-11-1983 made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-II, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore City, awarding a compensation of Rs. 55,000/- in a fatal accident's action.2. The claimant sought a compensation of Rs. 1,35,000/-for the death of her husband, Ramaiah, in theMotor accident which occurred on the Hosur Road, Bangalore at 10-30 A.M. on 18-10-1980, The deceased - Ramaiah was a pillionrider on the Scooter MAE 6673 driven by Kalappa, (P.W.2) and that the Car, MEN 7388 owned by the Ist appellant and driven by Shivashankar, (R.W. 1) collided against the scooter. Ramaiah succumbed to the injuries on 20-10-1980 at the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF JUNE, 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA` WRIT APPEAL No.587 OF2016(L-PF) BETWEEN:1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, NO.2, MARUTHI COMPLEX, 1ST A MAIN ROAD, HIG A SECTOR, NEAR SBI, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 064.2. RECOVERY OFFICER EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.2, MARUTHI COMPLEX, 1ST A MAIN ROAD, HIG A SECTOR, NEAR SBI, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. ...APPELLANTS (BY SMT.B.V. VIDYULATHA., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. HMT LIMITED, A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1913, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 032, 2 REPTD. BY CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR SRI.S.GIRISH KUMAR ..RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.N. KUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE TH...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... limited vs. union of india, (2004)6 scc 254; bhagat singh bugga vs. dewan jagbir sawhney, air 1941 cal.670; madanlal jalan vs. madanlal, air 1949 cal.495; bharat coking coal limited vs. jharia talkies and cold storage (p) limited, 1997 cwn 122; s.s.jain and company vs. union of india, (1994)1 chn 445, and new horizons limited ..... was agreed that the iron content, or the fe content, would be a minimum of 51.50%. hsl had applied for a no objection certificate with the directorate of mines and geology of the state government of goa, dated 7.6.2011, to export 41253 wet metric tonnes of processed iron ore fines to china on the ship m.v ..... mentioned in annexure-r.) 1. these petitions are heard and decided together since certain common issues arise. 2. in first of these petitions, petitioner no.1, m/s. coastal mines and minerals (hereinafter referred to as cmm, for brevity) is a registered partnership firm. petitioner no.2, prasanna v ghotage (hereinafter referred to as ghotage, for brevity), is one .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... . no such limitation is imposed under mmdr act, relating to levy of fdt which is infact, relatable to entry 54 of list ii (i) in hingir-rampur coal company ltd., the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952, which imposed a cess, was upheld due to certain reasons as narrated supra, but the hon'ble supreme court recorded that the field ..... act of 1951 and the state legislation of 1952. it was held that the central act dealt with the control of all industries including coal, whereas the state act was with regard to the development of the mining areas notified under it. it was held that the central act and the state act operated in different fields and entries 52 and ..... it is so enacted in order to see that throughout the indian union, the rents, royalties and other taxes payable in respect of mining and minerals are uniform. it may be recalled here that in hingir rampur coal company's case, air 1961 sc 459, the supreme court has stated that the scope of the central act is wider than the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... . no such limitation is imposed under mmdr act, relating to levy of fdt which is infact, relatable to entry 54 of list ii (i) in hingir-rampur coal company ltd., the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952, which imposed a cess, was upheld due to certain reasons as -:329. :- narrated supra, but the hon ble supreme court recorded ..... of 1951 and the state legislation of 1952. it was held that the central act dealt with the control of all industries including coal, whereas the state act was with regard to the development of the mining areas notified under it. it was held that the central act and the state act operated in different fields and entries 52 ..... it is so enacted in order to see that throughout the indian union, the rents, royalties and other taxes payable in respect of mining and minerals are uniform. it may be recalled here that in hingir rampur coal company's -:176. :- case, air1961sc459 the supreme court has stated that the scope of the central act is wider than the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... also the evidence placed on record. the trial court has failed to appreciate the evidence in a proper perspective. the immovable properties were acquired by borrowing huge loan from the nationalised banks. it is difficult to infer that the properties were acquired by means of ill-gotten money. therefore, in my view, confiscation of the properties by the trial court is ..... home of the offence of criminal misconduct. in this case, there is a positive evidence to the effect that rs.24,17,31,274/- has been borrowed loans from the nationalised banks by a-1 to a-4, firms and companies. this is a lawful source of income. from the evidence on record, it reveals that this amount has been utilized .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section, through auction by competitive bidding on such terms and conditions, as may be prescribed, for the purpose of granting reconnaissance permit, prospecting licence or mining lease in respect of any area containing coal or lignite. unamended provision was also of similar - 43 - nature except that the companies which can be selected now for this purpose under the ..... been rendered, because the rights of the litigants in an appeal are determined under the law in force at the date of the suit. even before the days of coke, whose maxim - a new law ought to be prospective, not retrospective in its operation - is oft-quoted, courts have looked with disfavour upon laws which take away ..... or the licensee shall have a right for obtaining a have a right for obtaining a prospecting licence followed by prospecting licence followed by a mining lease, or a mining a mining lease, or a mining lease, as the case may be, in lease, as the case may be, in respect of that mineral in that respect of that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... section, through auction by competitive bidding on such terms and conditions, as may be prescribed, for the purpose of granting reconnaissance permit, prospecting licence or mining lease in respect of any area containing coal or lignite. unamended provision was also of similar - 43 - nature except that the companies which can be selected now for this purpose under the ..... been rendered, because the rights of the litigants in an appeal are determined under the law in force at the date of the suit. even before the days of coke, whose maxim - a new law ought to be prospective, not retrospective in its operation - is oft-quoted, courts have looked with disfavour upon laws which take away ..... or the licensee shall have a right for obtaining a have a right for obtaining a prospecting licence followed by prospecting licence followed by a mining lease, or a mining a mining lease, or a mining lease, as the case may be, in lease, as the case may be, in respect of that mineral in that respect of that .....
Tag this Judgment!