Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 chapter iii payment of amount Page 9 of about 95 results (0.065 seconds)

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (including two in the minority) and by no other.398. it may be mentioned that some misgivings were expressed about minerva mills in sanjeev coke manufacturing co. v. bharat coking coal ltd.[592]. the misgivings were not spelt out by the bench except that it is stated that the case has left us perplexed seemingly for ..... parliament. as already mentioned, the working of the judiciary has affected the executive and legislature on several occasions, including (by way of illustration) privy purses case[792]., bank nationalisation case[793]., freedom of press case[794]., kesavananda bharati case (supra), indira gandhi case (supra), minerva mills case (supra), l. chandrakumar case (supra), m. nagaraj case ..... .2. justice khehar has mentioned in paragraph 17 of the draft order as follows:- the decision to remain as a member of the reconstituted bench was mine, and mine alone. 3. in my respectful opinion, when an application is made for the recusal of a judge from hearing a case, the application is made .....

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... did not have a due process clause as in the american constitution; the same consequence ensued after the decisions in the bank nationalisation case (1970) 1 scc248 and maneka gandhi case (1978) 1 scc248 in bachan singh (bachan singh v. state of punjab ..... singh guaranteed under article 21, are a great leap from 8 frankfurter, j.9 murphy, j.10 see (1604) 5 coke 91 semayne s case 9 the law declared by this court in gopalan11 - much before r.c. cooper12 and maneka ..... the list of privacy counterweights is long and growing. the recent additions of social media, mobile platforms, cloud computing, data mining, and predictive analytics now threaten to tip the scales entirely, placing privacy in permanent opposition to the progress of knowledge. 304 ..... the 384 charanjit lal chowdhury v. the union of india, air1951sc41; ram krishna dalmia v. shri justice s.r. tendolkar, air1958sc538; burrakur coal co. ltd. v. union of india air1961sc954; pathumma v. state of kerala (1970) 2 scr537; r.k. garg v. union .....

Indian Young Lawyers Association Vs. The State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.373 OF2006Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors. The State of Kerala & Ors. VERSUS Petitioner(s) Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI (for himself and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.) Introduction The irony that is nurtured by the society is to impose a rule, however unjustified, and proffer explanation or justification to substantiate the substratum of the said rule. Mankind, since time immemorial, has been searching for explanation or justification to substantiate a point of view that hurts humanity. The theoretical human values remain on paper. Historically, women have been treated with inequality and that is why, many have fought for their rights. Susan B. Anthony, known for her 2 feminist activity, succinctly puts, Men, their rights, and nothing more; women, their rights, and nothing less. It is a clear message.2. Neither the said message nor any kind of philosophy has opened up the large popul...

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... and commerce of the same kind . 85. in cole v. whitfield, the high court while disapproving of the "individual rights" approach authoritatively adopted in bank nationalisation case held that section 92 guarantees freedom of inter-state trade and commerce only against the discriminatory protectionist burdens. this decision brought to an end the "quite ..... is in keeping with the legislative intent manifested by the scheme of the act which is primarily meant for ensuring the safety of workmen employed in the mines. [emphasis supplied].95. ..we are not inclined to hold that the expression and used in the preamble, as well as in section 4 should be ..... , madras v. sri lakshmindra thirtha swamiar of sri shirur mutt (air1954sc282, mahant sri jagannath ramanuj das & anr. v. state of orissa & anr. (air1954sc400, the hingir-rampur coal co. ltd. v. state of orissa (air1961sc459, corporation of calcutta and anr. v. liberty cinema (air1965sc1107, kewal krishna puri and anr. v. state of punjab (1980) .....

Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India and Ors. Ministry of Women and Child D ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... j.said that though our constitution did not have a due process clause as in the american constitution; the same consequence ensued after the decisions in bank nationalisation case [rustom (banks cavasjee cooper 369 nationalisation) v. union of india, (1970) 1 scc248 and maneka gandhi case [maneka gandhi v. union of india, (1978) 2 scr621 (1978) 1 scc248 . which upheld in bachan .....

Forum For Peoples Collective Efforts (fpce) Vs. The State Of West Beng ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... public interest . the parliament subsequently enacted the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 which contains the declaration envisaged by the latter part of entry 54 of the union list. the high court had held ..... to the provisions of list i with respect to regulation and development under the control of the union . entry 54 of the union list deals with regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the ..... in the two acts. 24 35 in state of orissa vs m/s m a tulloch , the legislation in issue was the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952 under which certain areas were constituted as mining areas and the state government was empowered to levy a fee 24 (1964) 4 scr461132 part h at a percentage of the value .....

Energy Watchdog Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... chhattisgarh. also, a memorandum of understanding was entered into between adani enterprises ltd. and a german company for supply of non- coking coal of 3 to 5 million tons (imported coal) on a long term basis till the year 2032. a similar memorandum of understanding was also entered into between adani enterprises and ..... generating company wholly or partly owned by it; (ii) in relation to any inter-state generation, transmission, trading or supply of electricity and with respect to any mines, oil-fields, railways, national highways, airports, telegraphs, broadcasting stations and any works of defence, dockyard, nuclear power installations; (iii) in respect of the national ..... available, and although foreign shipping could be obtained at an increased freight, such foreign ships were liable to be captured by the enemy and destroyed through mines or sub-marines, and could be detained by british or allied warships. in the circumstances, the tennants (lancashire) ltd. judgment was applied, and the .....

Assocn. Of Vasanth Appts. Owners Vs. V. Gopinanth And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... require or steal someone s property for their betterment and the rule of equality requires the beneficiary to share the costs. appellants rely on rustom cavasjee cooper (banks nationalisation) v. union of india3, nagpur improvement trust and another v. vithal rao and others4, k.t. plantation private limited and another v. state of karnataka5. ..... the same thing as to claim transfer of the property to itself. the decision in pt. chet ram vashist, was followed in chairman, indore vikas pradhikaran vs. pure industrial coke & chemicals ltd {manu/sc/7706/2007 :2007. (8) scc705. again in babulal badriprasad varma vs. surat municipal corporation {manu/sc/7606/2008 :2008. (12) ..... any other mode is not acquisition or taking possession under article 300-a. in other words, if there is no law, there is no deprivation. acquisition of mines, minerals and quarries is deprivation under article 300-a. (emphasis supplied) 86. a constitution bench has considered the aspects arising out of the changes brought by .....

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... . whether the pith and substance doctrine is relevant in considering the question of infringement of; fundamental rights, the court observed at page 780 of the bank nationalisation case 'mr. palkhivala said that the tests of pith and substance of the subject matter and of direct and of incidental effect of the legislation are relevant ..... submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the view as expressed by subba rao, j. has been affirmed by the subsequent decisions in the bank nationalisation : [1970]3scr530 case and bennet colomon : [1973]2scr757 case.192. on 19th july, 1969, the acting president promulgated an ordinance no. 8 of 1969 transferring ..... the assumption in a. k- gopalan : 1950crilj1383 that certain articles of the constitution exclusively deal with specific matters cannot be accepted as correct. though the bank nationalisation case [1973] 3 scr 530 was concerned with the inter-relationship of article 31 and 19 and not of articles 21 and 19, the basic approach .....

Registrar of the Orissa High Court Vs. Baradakanta Misra and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1973Ori244; 1976CriLJ405

..... enough caution to persons embarking on the path of criticism.' though the case arose out of caustic criticism imputing motives to the judges of the supreme court in the bank nationalisation case, the underlined sentence makes it patently clear that any aspersion on institution of courts imputing motive constitutes contempt. the institution of courts and administration of justice cannot be confined .....