Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 chapter iii payment of amount Page 4 of about 95 results (0.253 seconds)

Planters Forum Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... ownership of the resources must vest in the community i.e. the state. a legislation such as the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act may be a legislation for the acquisition by the state of coking coal mines and coke oven plants belonging to private parties but it is not a legislation towards securing that the ownership and ..... it means and includes all resources, natural and man-made, public and private-owned.22. in view of the foregoing discussion, we hold that the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 is a legislation for giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principle specified in article 39(b) of the ..... shri ashoke sen drew pointed attention to the earlier affidavits filed on behalf of bharat coking coal limited and commented severely on the alleged contradictory reasons given therein for the exclusion of certain coke oven plants from the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act. but, in the ultimate analysis, we are not really to concern ourselves with .....

Excel Glasses Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ330Ker

..... though some observations were made, which could only be treated as obiter, that judgment itself shows that what came up for consideration therein was only whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, enacted under article 39(b), was immune under article 31c from attack on ground of violation of articles 14 or 19,7. a division bench ..... and what came up for consideration in that case was only the correctness of a division bench decision in bharat coking coal ltd. v. p.k. agarwala 1979(3) scc 609 holding that term 'coking coal mine' does not include a coke oven plant and whether the act challenged therein was saved by article 39(b) or not. according to them, ..... 1983-sc-239 (supra). that was the view taken in the decision in bapuji educational association v. state (air) 1986 karnalaka 119 (supra) also. 8. sanjeev coke's case (supra) could not and did not overrule minerva mills case(supra). a constitution bench of five judges cannot overrule another decision of a constitution bench of the .....

National Textile Corpn. (South Maharashtra) Ltd. Vs. Bhagirathi Gopal ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR601]; (1992)IILLJ111Bom

..... central government or the custodian in view of section 3(7) of the taking over act. it may be true that unlike section 9(2) of the coking coal mines nationalisation act (act no. 36 of 1972), section 3 (7) of the act does not specifically exclude liability in respect of gratuity or pension. however, that fact ..... the liability to make payment of gratuity, it is necessary to refer to the provision itself. the provision reads thus :'(f) 'employer' means, in relation to any establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop - (i) ...... (ii) ..... (iii) in any other case, the person, who, or the authority which, has the ..... ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment, factory, mine, oilfield, plantation, port, railway company or shop, and where the said affairs are entrusted to any other person, whether called a manager, on managing director or by any other .....

Coal India Ltd Vs. Competition Commission Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , which came to be continued under the essential commodities act. the coal controller controlled the quality and quantity as noticed in ashoka smokeless coal india (p) 31 ltd. and others22. considering its vital importance, it became the only mineral which was nationalized in terms of the coking coal mines nationalization act, 1972 and the coal mines nationalisation act 1973. the colliery control order 1945 was repealed and replaced ..... by the colliery collar control order 2000 w.e.f. 01.01.2000.32. the preamble to the nationalisation act reads as follows: an act to provide for the acquisition and transfer .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. P. Saguna Wd/O. P. Balakrishna and 3 ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2009ACJ1733; 2008GLH(1)616; (2008)2GLR1357

..... vehicles againstthird party risks145. definitions.- in this chapter,-(a) 'authorised insurer' means an insurer for the time being carrying on general insurance business in india under the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972), and any government insurance fund authorised to do general insurance business under that act;(b) ...(c) 'liability', wherever used in relation to the death of .....

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Etc. Vs. Hansrajbhai V.Kodala and ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : I(2001)ACC618; 2001ACJ827; AIR2001SC1832; 2001(3)ALT34(SC); [2001]105CompCas743(SC); (2001)3GLR2156; JT2001(4)SC477; 2001(2)KLT235(SC); (2001)2MLJ180(SC); RLW2001(2)SC231;

..... whereof cannot be ascertained in spite of reasonable efforts for the purpose; (c) 'scheme' means the scheme framed under section 163. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972) or any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having the force of law, the general insurance corporation of indian formed .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. M/S. Arooran Sugars Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)473; AIR1997SC1815; JT1996(10)SC116; (1997)2MLJ111(SC); 1996(8)SCALE71; (1997)1SCC326; [1996]Supp8SCR193

..... amendments in the concerned act the court came to the conclusion:in the present case as already pointed out above, if sub-section (2) as introduced by the coal mines nationalisation laws (amendment) act 1986 in section 10 had existed since the very inception, there was no occasion for the high court or this court to issue a direction ..... for taking into account the price which was payable for the stock of coke lying on the date before the appointed day. the authority to introduce sub-section (2) in section 10 of the aforesaid act with retrospective effect cannot be ..... statutory fiction is being consistently followed by this court. reference in this connection may be made to the cases of state of bombay v. pandurang vinayak : 1953crilj1049 ; chief inspector of mines v. karam chand thapar : (1961)iillj146sc ; j.k. cotton spinning and weaving mills ltd. v. union of india : 1987(32)elt234(sc) ; m. venugopal v. .....

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC101; (1991)1CompLJ1(SC); JT1990(3)SC725; 1991LabIC91; (1991)ILLJ395SC; 1991Supp(1)SCC600; [1990]Supp1SCR142; 1991(1)SLJ56(SC)

..... provisions) act, 1971 was passed under the provisions of which act all undertakings of all insurers vested in the central government with effect from 13th may, 1971. this was pending nationalisation which took place in 1972 as aforesaid.95. section 7(1) of the said act which provided for the takeover of former employees reads as under:every whole-time officer ..... suit new conditions of a changing world, that is true, but the same is true with the principles of the cannon law generally; lord lindley held in janson v. driefontein mines ltd. [1902] a.c. 484 that 'a contract or other branch which is against public policy i.e. against the general interest of the country is illegal.'288. in ..... 'what has been' but 'what may be'. this is the role and purpose of constitutional interpretation by the apex court of the country. i know that this view of mine is not shared in this decision by my learned brothers. i respect their views, but i would like to hope that one day or the other this court would be .....

Rakesh Gupta and Others, Etc. Vs. Hyderabad Stock Exchange Ltd. and Ot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996AP413; 1996(2)ALT757; [1999]96CompCas645b(AP)

..... ) the life insurance corporation of india, established under the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (31 of 1956); (d) the general insurance corporation of india constituted under the general insurance corporation (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972); (e) the unit trust of india, establishedunder the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of1963); (f) the industrial credit and investment corporation of india ..... , 1956 (1 of 1956); (g) the subsidiaries of any of the corporations or companies specified in (a) to (f) and any subsidiary of the state bank of india or any nationalised bank set up for providing merchant banking services, buying and selling securities and other similar activities. (4a) a company as defined in the companies act, 1956 (i of 1956), shall .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kadviben Udabhai Rathwa and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC345; 2006ACJ2019; AIR2006Guj120; (2006)2GLR1257

..... recent decision in state of haryana v. darshan devi 1979 acj 205 this court observed:-now that insurance against third party risk is compulsory and motor insurance is nationalised and transport itself is largely by state undertakings, the principle of no fault liability and on the spot settlement of claims should become national policy. 19. unless ..... may be paid every month to the dependents according to their share for the period to which they are entitled.21. the insurance companies are now nationalised and the necessity for awarding lump sum payment to secure the interest of the dependents is no longer there. regular monthly payments could be made through one ..... of the nationalised banks nearest to the place of residence of the dependents. payment of monthly installments and avoidance of lump sum payment would reduce substantially the burden on .....