Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(4)ALD445; 2008(4)ALT287
..... taking the action, an opinion of the advocate general of the state of bihar was sought by the respondent. referring to the provisions of the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972, the advocate general opined that such amount could be claimed by the state government from the appellant company. reference was made to ..... bihar and orissa public demands recovery act, 1914, in view of the provisions of the coal bearing areas (acquisition and development) act, 1957, the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and also the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972. but it also cannot be overlooked that the action has been taken under ..... as to the jurisdiction of the state government and/or its officers in initiating certificate proceedings against the company. regarding the earlier decision in national coal development corporation ltd. v. state of bihar : air1984pat280 , the high court was right in observing that the contention regarding alternative remedy was neither .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1995(3)ALT228
..... amendment of the said provision by the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976, got restored.14. in sanjeev coke mfg. co. v. bharat coking coal ltd. (3 supra), writs were filed in calcutta high court questioning the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 pursuant to which the coal mines and coke oven plants belonging to the petitioner, were nationalized. the cases were withdrawn to the supreme court. the challenge to ..... of article 14. the central government claimed protection of article 31-c of the constitution of india. the question that arose for consideration of the supreme court, was whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act, 1972 was entitled to the protection of article 31-c of the constitution. we may note here that the protection of article 31-c was claimed on the ground .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1996AP413; 1996(2)ALT757; [1999]96CompCas645b(AP)
..... ) the life insurance corporation of india, established under the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (31 of 1956); (d) the general insurance corporation of india constituted under the general insurance corporation (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972); (e) the unit trust of india, establishedunder the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of1963); (f) the industrial credit and investment corporation of india ..... , 1956 (1 of 1956); (g) the subsidiaries of any of the corporations or companies specified in (a) to (f) and any subsidiary of the state bank of india or any nationalised bank set up for providing merchant banking services, buying and selling securities and other similar activities. (4a) a company as defined in the companies act, 1956 (i of 1956), shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1990AP20
..... is understood as prohibiting the said activity, it would be void, being violative of the respondent's fundamental right under art. 19(1)(a). they point out that in bank nationalisation case, : [1970]3scr530 the supreme court has overruled the theory expounded in gopalan, : 1950crilj1383 , and has held that it is not the form and object of the law that is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : AIR1993AP76
..... hardship. our attention is invited to the decision in vishnu-das hundumal v. state of madhya pradesh, : [1981]3scr234 , wherein the supreme court held that discrimination in implementing schemes of nationalisation of road transport services by allowing some operators to ply their services on overlapping portion of the notified route while denying others such facility invited interference by the court. he .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (1984)IILLJ140AP
..... option. he is expected to remain steadfast, to higher purpose - the loyal discharge of the duties entrusted to him by govt. he has to as carefully implement the policy for nationalisation of industries, as he may in a changed situation reverse the process and undo it. they cannot carry their personal views actively into the sphere of administration and sabotage the .....
Tag this Judgment!