Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: coking coal mines nationalisation act 1972 chapter iii payment of amount Page 10 of about 95 results (0.085 seconds)

State of Andhra Pradesh and Others, Etc. Vs. Mcdowell and Co. and Othe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)428; AIR1996SC1627; JT1996(3)SC679; (1997)1MLJ82(SC); 1995(4)SCALE762; (1996)3SCC709; [1996]3SCR721

..... in stages. it is not necessary that the prohibition should be total and absolute whenever it is imposed. this principle has been affirmed by this court in the matter of nationalisation of bus routes c.s. rowji v. state of andhra pradesh : [1964]6scr330 .51. counsel for the petitioners complained of discrimination in the matter of providing exemptions. it is complained ..... that by virtue of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, which contains a declaration in terms of entry 52 in list-i and the schedule whereof included 'fuel gases - (coal gas, natural gas and the like)' under item 2(3), the power to make law with respect to industries engaged in the manufacture of gas has been vested in the .....

Superintendent of Post Offices, Khammam and anr. Vs. Kalluri Vasayya

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1984)IILLJ140AP

..... option. he is expected to remain steadfast, to higher purpose - the loyal discharge of the duties entrusted to him by govt. he has to as carefully implement the policy for nationalisation of industries, as he may in a changed situation reverse the process and undo it. they cannot carry their personal views actively into the sphere of administration and sabotage the .....

Anil Kumar Khurana Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)749; 1996(36)DRJ558; 1996RLR140

..... the petitioners therein. thereforee, the supreme court made what they described as the constructive approach by eliminating the discrimination by permitting the petitioners also to operate on those nationalised routes. '(84) in the third case referred to above, this court dealt with the case of a student who failed to pass the examination held for the ..... others who had been permitted to operate on the very nationalised routes. that was stated to be on account of inadvertence or over-sight on the part of the government agency. in that circumstance, thesupreme court observed that ..... the state of madhyapradesh and others : [1981]3scr234 is really not of much assistance to support the claim made by the petitioner. it was conceded there that the nationalisation of certain routes for the exclusive operation of the state under taking under chapter-iv (a) of the m. v. act had resulted in the discrimination of some .....

United Bank of India Ltd. Vs. United India Credit and Development Comp ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas689(Cal)

..... imaginary and he referred to the affidavit-in-opposition of rajaram sharma in support of his contention. he submitted that the other banks which have been nationalised have been amalgamated with well-established and reputed companies, as for example, central bank of india with tata engineering and locomotive company and bank of india ..... said years have been approved and adopted by the shareholders of the petitioner-bank in its annual meetings.(d) the petitioner-bank by reason of the nationalisation of the banking business has either to diversify its business and change its name to carry on other business or to send itself in voluntary liquidation ..... beneficial for, inter alia, the following reasons :(a) petitioner-bank was one of the foremost banking concerns of the eastern region in india and banking business being nationalised with effect from 10th of july, 1969, under the provisions of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970, the undertaking of the .....

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the origins of substantive due process, 16 const. commentary 315, 326 327 (1999) (concluding that founding-era american statesmen accustomed to viewing due process through the lens of [sir edward] coke and [william] blackstone could [not] have failed to understand due process as encompassing substantive as well as procedural terms ); gedicks, an originalist defense of substantive due process: magna carta, higher ..... ? as the questions suggest, state and local gun regulation can become highly complex, and these are only a few uncertainties that quickly come to mind. caperton v. a. t. massey coal co. , 556 u. s. ___, ___ (2009) (roberts, c. j., dissenting) (slip op., at 10). the difficulty of finding answers to these questions is exceeded only by the importance of .....