Coa - Judgment Search Results

Harsha NitIn Kokate Vs. the Saraswat Co­op. Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(112)BomLR2014

would not vest.23. Considering some of these judgments it has been held in the case of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. 2002 (8) SCALE 388 that the term vest in common English

Employers In Relation To The Management Of Bhalgora Area (now Kustore ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

No.29873 OF2016 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHALGORA AREA (NOW KUSTORE AREA) OF M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS WORKMEN BEING REPRESENTED BY JANTA MAZDOOR SANGH RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Leave granted. This

Shine M.D. vs the Cable Tv Operators Association (Coa),

Court: Kerala

M.SUSEELA KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K. C.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR SINEESH K.M. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:1 THE CABLE TV OPERATORS ASSOCIATION (COA), COA BHAVAN, G-21, PANAMPILLY NAGAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PIN - 682036 2 THE PRESIDENT

Sahakari Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. the District Deputy Registrar, Co ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)BomCR569; (2008)110BOMLR1913; 2008(6)MhLj118

Ranjana Desai, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, taken up for hearing forthwith. 2. The petitionerunion is a registered trade union (for convenience, 'the petitioner or the petitionerunion'). It claims to be...

The Ambajogai Peoples Co­operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Shrimauli Builders ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR378; 2007(6)BomCR247; 2008(4)MhLj495

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. The Appeal in these proceedings is directed against an order of a Learned Single Judge dated 15th February, 2007, dismissing Judges Order 494 of 2006 filed by the Appellant for the payment to...

Lakhwinder Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR1040]; JT2008(8)SC207; 2008(10)SCALE301; (2008)7SCC648; 2009(1)SLJ92(SC); 2008AIRSCW5231; 2008LABIC3334

authorities.6. It is the petitioner's case that the Special Selection Boards are expert bodies which consist of the COAS, the Vice-Chief of Army Staff and the six Corp-Commanders representing different fields/ branches of the Army, including officers

Union of India and ors. Vs. Harjeet Singh Sandhu Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1772; JT2001(4)SC597; 2001LabIC1707; 2001(3)SCALE336; (2001)5SCC593; [2001]2SCR1127; 2001(2)SCT1018(SC); 2002(1)SLJ1(SC); (2001)2UPLBEC1397

by the Chief of the Army Staff to the officer which inter alia stated - 'and whereas the COAS is further satisfied that your trial for the above misconduct is impracticable having become time-barred by the time

Major General I.P.S. Dewan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1995(70)FLR1070]; JT1995(2)SC654; 1995(2)SCALE182; (1995)3SCC383; [1995]2SCR532; 1995(3)SLJ135(SC); 1995(2)LC151(SC)

promotion to the rank of Lt. General.3. The adverse remarks complained of read as follows:'CONFIDENTIALADVERSE REMARKS OF THE COAS TO BE ENDORSED ON DOSSEIR IN THE CASE OF IC-12599L MAJ GEN IPS DEWAN, MGASC, HQ SOUTHERN COMMAND1.

All India Council for Technical Education Vs. Council of Architecture ...

Court: Delhi

No. 1 herein, is constituted under Section 3 (1) AA. Section 3 (3) (b) AA provides that the COA will, inter alia, include two persons nominated by the AICTE. At the time of the enactment of the

Council of Architecture Vs. All India Council for Technical Education ...

Court: Delhi

226 of the Constitution of India being grieved by the communication dated 20th December, 2006 made by the COA informing to the AICTE that the nominations made by it were not in accordance with the provisions of