Co V Prabhu - Judgment Search Results
V. Prabhu Vs The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE V. Prabhu ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE V. Prabhu ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District 606 604.2. The District Registrar, Tiruvannamalai District 606 601.3. The Joint
infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Vijaya V. Prabh ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-04-2009
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. This is a plaintiff's Summary Suit under Order 37 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for decree and order against the defendant in the sum of Rs. 12,01,00,654/as set … and conditions of the facility granted to the company which was also signed by late Shri Venkatesh Lakshman Prabhu, Managing Director of the Company as a Guarantor. The Managing Director of the Company late Shri Venkatesh Prabhu
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. V. Prabhu Das and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-23-2004
Reported in: 2005ACJ409
Matched in: Parties National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. V. Prabhu Das and anr.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vassant Holiday Homes Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Madan V. Prabhu
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-22-2000
Reported in: 2001(3)BomCR493; [2003]116CompCas172(Bom); [2004]50SCL705(Bom)
3 happened to be the subscribers to the memorandum of association of the company. Appellant No. 2 Umesh V. Prabhu is the managing director right from the beginning. Respondent No. 3 and respondent (original petitioner) Madan V. Prabhu … R.G. Deshpande, J.1. This is a company appeal by original respondents; under Section 483 of the Companies Act/ 1956 ; challenging the order dated September
Nowroji Hormasji Pathak Vs. Shrinivas V. Prabhu
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-13-1921
Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR95; 66Ind.Cas.929
Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. The plaintiff filed this suit in the Small Causes Court to eject his tenants (the defendants) from certain shops in Lamington Road belonging to him which he wished … rented certain premises in Hornby Road the floor space of which was 2000 square feat. He had to vacate these premises and consequently he wanted to occupy his own premises in order to store his goods and
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free