Co V Electrical - Judgment Search Results

S.V. Electricals Ltd. Vs. Sylvania and Laxman Ltd.

Court: Delhi

1. The captioned suit was originally filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) for recovery of sum of Rs 48,89,814/- alongwith interest … further averred that against supplies made the plaintiff would issue challan/vouchers in the prescribed format against orders raised verbally and/or in writing or telephonically. It is the plaintiffs case that one of the conditions, which obtained in

S.V.Electricals Ltd Vs. Sylvania and Laxman Ltd.

Court: Delhi

recovery of `48,89,814/- together with pendente lite and future interest @ 21% per annum has been dismissed with costs in sum of `75,000/- against the plaintiff.2. It is the case of the plaintiff that on orders being … 1. Vide impugned judgment and decree dated 31.11.2010, the suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of `48,89,814/- together with

S.V. Electricals Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)LC325Tri(Delhi)

1. These four appeals and two miscellaneous applications for hearing the case early are disposed of by this common order inasmuch as the issue for determination in these four appeals is the same.2. The issue is whether … these four appeals is the same.2. The issue is whether the Commissioner, Central Excise can exercise a power vested in him under Sub-section (3) of Section 35E to review orders and direct filing of appeals.3. The facts

S.V. Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT617TriDel

namely, Grinding Machine and Lathe Machine on the ground that these were used only for breakdown maintenance and correcting the tools and spare parts of machines. They themselves even disclosed this use in the declaration filed under … themselves even disclosed this use in the declaration filed under Rule 57T(2) of the Rules. Therefore, keeping in view the use of the goods, the Modvat credit has been rightly declined to the appellants being not 'Capital

S.V. Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT534TriDel

upon to decide on an issue referred by the Northern Bench (S) of this Tribunal in view of conflicting decisions on the issue by Two Member Benches. The issue is whether a plain Molybdenum wire used in … been called upon to decide on an issue referred by the Northern Bench (S) of this Tribunal in view of conflicting decisions on the issue by Two Member Benches. The issue is whether a plain Molybdenum wire … 1996 to July, 1997.2. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of electric filaments viz. Tungsten filaments falling under the above Tariff Heading, during the

S.V. Electricals Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

upon to decide on an issue referred by the Northern Bench (S) of this Tribunal in view of conflicting decisions on the issue by Two Member Benches. The issue is whether a plain Molybdenum wire used in … been called upon to decide on an issue referred by the Northern Bench (S) of this Tribunal in view of conflicting decisions on the issue by Two Member Benches. The issue is whether a plain Molybdenum wire … 1996 to July 1997.2. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of electric filaments viz. Tungsten filaments falling under the above Tariff Heading, during the

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S.V. Electricals Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2005]274ITR334(MP)

within a week. (R. D. VYAS J.) and (SHAMBHOO SINGH J.)'2. Heard Shri R. L. Jain, learned senior counsel with Ku V. Mandlik, learned counsel for the Revenue. None for the assessee.3. We have seen and perused

Ravindra Bharati Vs. S.V. Electricals Limited and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: II(2007)BC414

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. Heard finally with consent of both the parties.This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC for quashment of the proceedings … ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. Heard finally with consent of both the parties.This is a petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC … Company.2. Short facts of the case are that respondent No. 1, S.V. Electricals Limited filed a complainant before CJM, Dewas for the trial of the

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. S.V. Electricals Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT104TriDel

1. This is an application filed by the department for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The order passed by the Commissioner was received on 31-5-99 as per … the application is neither convincing nor substantiated to condone the delay. The Supreme Court itself has taken the view administrative reason is not a sufficient ground to condone the delay.Accordingly, I am not convinced with the reason

Kumaran Chemicals Vs. the Executive Engineer-v, Electricity Department ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2006)4MLJ637

non-payment thereof, restoration of supply of electricity, tampering, distress or damage to electrical plant, electric lines or meter, entry of distribution licensee or any person … petitioner was issued with a show cause notice on 08.08.2006, alleging that on 07.08.2006 when the H.T. service connection was inspected by the Asst. Engineer / Urban and the Junior Engineer / T.R. Pattinam in the presence … any disconnection.3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the order passed is in violation of the principles of natural justice and is contrary to the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003, which