Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Co V Asstt - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 03 1996

Assistant Commissioner Wealth Tax Vs. Sultan Brothers (P) Ltd. (Also S ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-03-1996

Reported in: (1997)58TTJ(Mumbai)562

40 of the Finance Act, 1983 itself.2. We have heard the learned Departmental Representative as well as assessees counsel. The facts of the case are that the assessee owned a building commonly known as Hotel Ambassador building … ORDERI. S. VERMA, J.M. :Appeal Nos. 624 & 625/Bom/1991 are by the Revenue in which following grounds of appeal has been


May 27 1997

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. G. S. BhatiA. (Also G. S. Bha ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: May-27-1997

Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Mumbai)91

Department, relating to same assessee for the asst. yr. 1986-87 are heard together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience.2. ITA No. 5633/B/90 : In this appeal the Revenue has objected to … ORDERI. S. VERMA, J.M. :These two appeals, one by the assessee and the other by the Department, relating to same assessee


Jul 12 1996

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Meghraj GolechA. (Meghraj Gol ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-12-1996

Reported in: (1997)57TTJ(Mumbai)209

of the Supreme Court in the case of Ghanshyamdas vs . Regional Asstt. CST & Ors. : [1964]51ITR557(SC) to support his argument that income cannot … ORDERJ. K. VERMA, A. M. :All these cross-appeals and cross-objections arise from a common order of CIT(A) in the above-mentioned assessment years. They were heard together and are being disposed of by … ORDERJ. K. VERMA, A. M. :All these cross-appeals and cross-objections arise from a common order of CIT(A) in the above-mentioned assessment


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 19 1993

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sak Industries (P.) Ltd. (Sak ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-19-1993

Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)457

ORDERR.M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising for our consideration various issues.2. Taking up for consideration the Revenues appeal, various grounds have been raised in respect of the … ORDERR.M. MEHTA, A.M. :These are cross-appeals directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) raising for our consideration various issues.2. Taking up for consideration the Revenues appeal, various grounds have been raised in respect of the items


May 13 1996

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Snia Fibre Spa (Snia Fibre Sp ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-13-1996

Reported in: (1996)55TTJ(Del)554

ORDERN. S. CHOPRA, A. M. :Both the Revenue as also the assessed are in cross appeals against common order dt. 30th Aug., 1989, of the learned CIT(A) for the two assessment years. These appeals are consolidated … in appeal before the learned CIT(A) when it was submitted that the rate of exchange for calculation of value in rupees should be telegraphic buying rate as on the date on which the tax is required to


Apr 30 1997

Babu Ram Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. (Also Prabhu Dayal ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-1997

Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Del)105

J.M. :These cross-appeals by the assessees and the Revenue are directed against different orders of CIT(A). The major common controversy involved in most of appeals relates to assessment of moneylending business for which documents were seized in … all sons of late Shri Shiv Charan Das. These brothers were admittedly carrying on kirana business (separately) at village Dhaunj, Distt. Faridabad, and were assessed in individual capacity relating to that business. No income from moneylending business


Nov 14 2003

Master Abhinav Malhotra and anr. V Asstt. Cit

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-14-2003

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Del)144

a view has been entertained by the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal in the case of R.K. Sayal v. Asstt. CIT ITA No. 1165/Chd/1996, dated 11-2-1999 as also in another case of Jawahar Lal 0swal v. Assn. CIT … two different assessed's and one cross objection by the revenue are directed to be disposed of by a common order as common issues are involved.2. The assessing officer assessed an income of Rs. 12,09,436 as 'income from


May 29 1997

S. A. Growth Fund (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. ( ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-1997

Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Del)384

of the above sum in terms of the Bearer Bonds Act. The Asstt. CIT however, asked the assessed to explain the source of the funds … the case of S.A. Growth Fund (P) Ltd.The facts in brief are that the assessee, a private limited company was incorporated on 11th February, 1991. It had acquired 885 Special Bearer Bonds issued by the Central Government … 2,000 per bond. The total amount realised by the assessed on such redemption was :Rs.(i) Against the face value of Rs. 10,000 per bond (885 bonds) 88,50,000(ii) As premium of Rs. 2000 per bond for 885 bonds


Oct 01 1997

Jayanti Lal Patel Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and ors. (A ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Oct-01-1997

Reported in: (1997)142CTR(Raj)571

from unexplained sources. Similarly, after raid, enquiry has been made by the Asstt. CIT before order under s. 132(5), the statements of seller of plot … has prayed that the aforesaid assessment orders be set aside. Since the issue of ownership of FDRs is common in both the writ petitions, therefore, both the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.2. … s. 132(5) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter, referred as the Act) has been passed and therein the view has been taken that Shri Jayanti Lal Patel is owner of these 3 FDRs and not Dr. Tomar.


Oct 28 1994

V. Anandmull JaIn (indl.) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Al ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-28-1994

Reported in: (1996)54TTJ(Mad)50

ORDERS. KANNAN, A. M. :Giving rise, as they do, to certain common issues, these appeals by the assessees were heard together and are disposed of by a common order.2. The … a common order.2. The aforesaid assessees are members of one and the same group doing business in money-lending, vehicle financing, sale of fertilizers and hulling of paddy. This group was subjected to search and seizure operations on


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial