Co Respondent - Judgment Search Results
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
and be proceeded with accordingly. For the balance claim the parties are relegated the suit subject to the respondent disposing the balance sum with the Registrar Original Side, by September 15, 2014. In case the above sum … CP No.659 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE MATTER OF: JAI BALAJ.INDUSTRIES AND SOUTHERN ROAD CARRIERS LTD.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-25-2014
Form No.J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present: The Hon’ble Justice Nishita Mhatre And The Hon’ble Justice Samapti … and on completion of investigation charge-sheet under Sections 364/201/302 of the Indian Penal Code was submitted against the accused Archana Mondal. Accordingly trial started and after completion of trial the learned Sessions Judge, 3rd Court Malda convicted
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-04-2016
Purushottam Dass Bangur For the Petitioner : Mr.S.K. Kapoor, Sr.Advocate Mr.P.K Jhunjhunwala, Advocate Mr.Ravi Kapoor, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr.Mr.Mr.Mr.Hearing concluded on : April 20, 2016 Judgment on : May 4, 2016 S.P.Sarkar, Sr.Advocate Debajyoti Datta, … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction Original Side G.A.No.949 of 2013 PLA No.255 of 2011 In the Goods
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-12-2016
Kumar Tiwari -Vs.- The State of West Bengal & ORS.For the petitioner : Mr.Sunil Kumar Chakraborty For the Respondent Nos.4, 6 & 7 : Mr.Kishore Dutta Mr.T.M.Siddiqui Mr.S.Siddiqui Mr.Azim Md.Sabir For the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Shivakant Prasad W.P.No.984 of 2015 Vinod Kumar
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-14-2016
Limited For the Appellant / Defendant : Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Abhijit Gangopadhyay, Advocate, Ms.Supriya Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondent / Plaintiff : Mr.Utpal Bose, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Ashis Kr. Mukherjee, Advocate, Mr.Sushil Kr. Sewak, Advocate. Hearing is concluded on … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Nishita Mhatre & The Hon’ble Justice Tapabrata
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
Mr Mr Mr J.Chowdhury, Adv., M. S. Tiwari, Adv., S. K. Tiwari, Adv., R. Das, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr Surojit Nath Mitra, Sr Adv., Mr Sakya Sen, Adv., Ms Sanchari Chakraborty, Adv. Hearing concluded on: November … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE GA3436OF2014IN PLA59OF2010IN THE GOODS OF: NAND BHERUMAL ADVANI ALIAS NANDU
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-10-2017
Form No.(J2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE Present: The Hon’ble Justice Ranjit Kumar Bag C. S. No.246 … during the occasion would create constraints in the process of administration of justice.”. In this reported case the respondent/defendant attempted to explain the background of the prior relationship between the parties and to establish that the appellant/plaintiff
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-2017
Rakesh Tiwari, J.AND The Hon’ble Mir Dara Sheko, J.For the appellant : Mr. Sutirtha Das, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Arindam Moitra, Advocate Heard on :07. 02.2017 Judgment on :12. 04.2017 Delivered by Hon’ble Justice Rakesh … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE GA3771of 2016 APO317of 2016 Smt. Basu Rani Paul Corporation & Ors.
Appellant Vs. Respondent
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-17-2017
the petitioners : Mr. Sibaji Sen, Advocate, Mr. Dipankar More, Advocate, Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pradyumna Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Tapas Saha, Advocate. Heard on: February 17, March 17, and April 7, … IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE PRESENT : Hon’ble Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon’ble Justice Arijit Banerjee
Petitioner Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
against the plaintiffs. Pending the suit, this application came to be filed. In that application, on 20.04.2012 this court found that the respondents have not filed any counter. This court had recorded the oral statement of the … the suit, this application came to be filed. In that application, on 20.04.2012 this court found that the respondents have not filed any counter. This court had recorded the oral statement of the counsel for the respondents
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free