Co Relation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co relation Page 1 of about 224 results (0.028 seconds)Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...
Court: Jharkhand
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar
of res judicata or merger have no application and this Court has jurisdiction to recall the order dated 19.5.1998. In support and other requirements of law were not complied with in relation to their employment and ultimately the management stopped them from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmployers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...
Court: Jharkhand
Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]
to 50 workers were working in the said Durga Pokapahari Colliery in the year 1979 and the colliery was running in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmployers in Relation to the Management of Bhuli Township Administrati ...
Court: Jharkhand
Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2058; [2003(4)JCR34(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ554Jhar
work under the Management or under any contractor; engagement of contract labour on civil construction work and allied nature have not the principal employer and the contract labourer nor can such relationship be implied, on issuing a prohibition notification under Section 10(1)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen of Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr. Vs. Employers in Relati ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1973SC2251; [1973(26)FLR444]; (1973)IILLJ254SC; (1974)3SCC216; 1973(1)SLJ1044(SC)
were detained for more than one year and two for comparatively shorter period. It appears that one of the disputes arose saying that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in relation to (1) Calcutta Dock Labour Board, (2) The Master Stevedores'
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhir Pandit, Employers in Relation to the Management of the Senior S ...
Court: Jharkhand
and has recorded its findings that the workman was engaged continuously for 240 days in a year in between 29.11.1994 to back wages and if so to what extent.16. The issue relating to payment of back wages is by now well settled.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Labor Relations Board Vs. Brown
Court: US Supreme Court
major policy decisions properly made by Congress." American Ship Building Co. v. Labor Board, post at 380 U. S. 318 . and applying it in light of the actualities of industrial relations, the employers' conduct here is shown to be justified, and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmployees in Relation to Industry Colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. ...
Court: Patna
workmen. 5. Section 17 of the Nationalisation Act provides for continuity of employment of the workmen even after the Nationalisation on manager, or managing contractor of a coking coal mine in relation to any period prior to the appointed day (May 1,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmployers in Relation to the Management of Bijuri Sub Area, South East ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: [2006(110)FLR507]
all the respondents-workmen had given a written acceptance of this condition. Under the circumstances, no equity would flow in favour of the appropriate Government; otherwise will the appropriate Government; otherwise in relation to any other establishment the Government of the State in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmployer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...
Court: Jharkhand
Reported in: [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]
be completed by June 1990.4. Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Annexure-1 and submits that upon persons employed by the individuals or body of individuals in relation to such activity is less than ten; or (9) any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmployers in Relation to Bararee Coke Plant of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. ...
Court: Jharkhand
Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2164; [2003(3)JCR787(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ346Jhar
any Coking Coal Mines, but was an employee of Bararee Coke Oven Plant, the Management of which was taken over under as such management continues, exercise any powers of management in relation to the Coking Coal Mine.' It has already been mentioned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>