From

Co Ltd V Union - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 06 1996

Excell Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. V. Union of India and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-06-1996

Reported in: 1996(3)BomCR447; (1996)98BOMLR257; 1996(85)ELT225(Bom)

Notification No. 4 of 1968 was before the Supreme Court in the case of Ahura Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India 1982 ECR 625D (SC) : ECR C 649 SC : 1981 ELT 613 (S.C.). The appellant … A.V. Savant, J. 1. The 1st petitioner is a company manufacturing products known as 'INDOSTAT SF52' and 'INDOSTAT SF' which, the petitioners claim, are classifiable under Tariff Item

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1996

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. V. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-1996

Reported in: 1996(86)ELT205(Bom)

ORDERA.V. Savant, J. 1. Heard both the learned Counsel. 2. The petitioners - Crompton Greaves Ltd. - are a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. They

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 1992

Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India and Anotherwithraj Kanwar V. Union of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-1992

Reported in: AIR1993SC1407; JT1992(5)SC92; 1992(1)SCALE484; (1992)4SCC605; [1992]Supp1SCR53

to reagitate the points concluded by the earlier decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability. In The Keshav Mills Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North : [1965]56ITR365(SC) , it was pointed out that interest of public good should … suffice to say that both these petitions are a sequel to the decision in Sub-Committee on Judicial Accountability v. Union of India and Ors. : AIR1992SC320 - and were filed prior to Writ Petition No. 514 of 1992-Mrs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Dec 11 1973

M/S. Binani Bros. (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. M/S. Pragdas Ma ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-11-1973

Reported in: (1974)3CTR(SC)18

the goods out of the territory of India.'6. In State of Travancore Cochin & ors. v. The Bombay Co. Ltd. Patanjali Sastri, C.J. said that a sale by export involves a series of integrated activities commencing from the … metals for various countries and also from within the country for fulfilling its contracts with the Government of India through the DGS&D.; The import of non-ferrous metals was under Open General Licence till June 30, 1957. Thereafter,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 27 1996

Hitech (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors. Tico Machines (P) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-27-1996

Reported in: (1997)143CTR(AP)305

we may add that in Srikakollu Subba Rao & Co. vs . Union of India : [1988]173ITR708(AP) a Division Bench of this Court upheld the … are urged in these writ petitions, so they are heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. For appreciating the facts which give rise to the questions referred to hereunder it will be enough … 1992 which are representative of the facts in the other writ petitions.2. The petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of s. 43B and s. 36(1)(va) of the IT Act, 1961, in so far as they provide for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1996

Abdul Sattar Vs. Union of India and ors. (Also Chatisgarh Bidi Leaves ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-13-1996

Reported in: (1996)135CTR(MP)352

With great respect, the contention is absolutely misconceived because in somewhat identical situations in Delhi Cold Storage (P) Ltd. vs . CIT : [1991]191ITR656(SC) , the Supreme Court had occasion to examine the meaning of the word … writ petitions, the facts given in Writ Petition No. 1059/1996, Abdul Sattar vs. Union of India & Ors. are taken into consideration.3. The petitioner by … A. K. MATHUR, C.J. :All the aforesaid writ petitions involve common question of law; therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.2. For convenient disposal of all the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1999

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors. (Dina Nath and ors. V. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-02-1999

Reported in: [2000]242ITR584(P& H)

The Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Lan Eseda Steels Ltd. & Anr. v. Asstt. CIT & Ors. : [1994]209ITR901(AP) has also taken … counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on the decision of the Patna High Court in Santosh Verma v. Union of India : [1991]189ITR549(Patna) in this behalf. It would be apt to notice the relevant passage of this … will dispose of two writ petitions No. 14173 of 1998 and 742 of 1999 involving identical facts and common questions of law. In the CWP 14173 of 1999 there are two petitioners, namely, Raj Kumar and Vimal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Mr. Jalil Ahmed Ansari and anr. Vs. the Development Commissioner and o ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-30-2001

Reported in: 2001IVAD(Delhi)838; 91(2001)DLT747; 2001(59)DRJ9

ORDERVijender Jain, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the election to the Carpet Export Promotion Council on the ground that the notification issued by respondent-Carpet Export Promotion Council notifying the schedule of election, date … issued by respondent-Carpet Export Promotion Council notifying the schedule of election, date of issue of the list of valid nominations and issue of postal ballot papers were on 1.12.2000 and last date of the receipt of the … of the matters above, decision of the Development Commissioner (Handicrafts), Govt. of India, Ministry of Textiles, shall be final and binding.4. She further contended that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1997

Jayamal Jayantilal Thakore Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and or ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jun-18-1997

Reported in: (1998)144CTR(Guj)384

upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Mohammed Anis vs . Union of India , it was contended that since the power of the … ABICHANDANI, J. :In these two writ petitions which were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment, the petitioners have sought a direction on the IT authorities to enquire into and investigate the sources … that the respondent No. 4 Mr. Shankarsinh Waghela earlier belonged to the Bharatiya Janata Party and with a view to overthrow the elected council of ministers, he had revolted 'with muscle and money power .....' and misusing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1997