Co Developer - Judgment Search Results

Development Vs. Cesc Limited and anr.R

Court: Kolkata

disposed of. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, National Bank of Agriculture order of and Rural status quo Development, taking obtained the by shelter respondent of the no.2 in

Rail Land Development Authority vs.parsvnath Developers Limited & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Close. except and 4.2 Termination due to non fulfillment of Conditions Precedent by the Developer Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained of the Agreement obliges RLDA to make payments to the developer within 12 months of the Transfer Date. The expression Transfer

Rail Land Development Authority vs.parsvnath Developers Limited and An ...

Court: Delhi

Agreement, which deals with amendment and waivers. The learned senior counsels contend that its an admitted fact that there is no expiry of the rectification period/cure period of 120 days the Developer/Claimant No.2 for making the overdue payments. Thus, from a plain

Parsvnath Developers Limited Vs. Rail Land Development Authority

Court: Delhi

terms that there is a vital distinction between administrative and contractual law decisions and the concept of administrative law and fairness 2012 Pronounced on: November 22, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6693/2011 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate

Vgn Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority

Court: Chennai

No Objection Certificate in favour of the petitioner. In this context, it is contended that the second respondent, on behalf of 2014 and M.P. Nos. 1 to 3 of 2014 VGN Developers Pvt Ltd Rep. By Authorised Signatory No.15, Wallace Garden 2nd

Shiv Developers Thr. Sunilbhai Somabhai Ajmeri Vs. Aksharay Developers

Court: Supreme Court of India

69(2), it is referring to a contract entered into in course of business transactions by the unregistered plaintiff firm with its Somabhai Ajmeri, acting on behalf of the appellant firm Shiv Developers. It has yet further been alleged that the cheques issued

Parsvnath Developers Limited Vs. Rail Land Development Authority

Court: Delhi

of the principles governing intervention of the writ courts in contractual matters. It stands reiterated by Apex Court in Master Marine to use an existing company, i.e, M/s. Parsvnath Promoters & Developers Pvt. Ltd. (PPDPL) as Special Purpose Vehicle for entering into

Marusha Engineers & Developers Pvt Ltd and Anr vs.delhi Development Au ...

Court: Delhi

made and the prayer for interim relief rejected. In our considered view, the learned Writ Court in doing so has not 12166/2018 Date of decision:16. h September, 2019 MARUSHA ENGINEERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

indore Development Authority, Indore Vs. Indore Development Authority ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR57]; 2001(1)MPHT367

of this Court.30. I was given to understand by learned counsel for parties, that no SLP was preferred by the State (for short 'IDA'), which was to be financed by Overseas Development Authority (for short 'ODA'), a project floated by British Government.

National Dairy Development Board Vs. National Dairy Development Board ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1986(52)FLR609]; (1985)2GLR1415; (1986)ILLJ456Guj

allowance, halting allowance and other similar charges. Even this clause contemplates the possibility of profit called surplus emerging as a result implementation, management information and economic analysis, manpower development, research and development and procurement of equipment and supplies. Project planning includes feasibility