Co Assessor - Judgment Search Results

Dy. Assessor and Collector and ors. Vs. Frizair Corporation

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1984(1)BomCR234

being Municipal Appeal No. M. 182/77 under section 217 of the said Act against the order of Dy. Assessor and Collector under section 192(1) dated 9-3-1977 received by respondents on 12-3-77 rejecting the respondents' application for refund … D.M. Rege, J.1. These two appeals under section 217 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation, are against the judgment and order of the Additional Chief Judge of the Court of Small Causes dated

The Assessors Vs. Osbornes

Court: US Supreme Court

The Assessors v. Osbornes - 76 U.S. 567 (1869) U.S. Supreme Court The Assessors v. Osbornes, 76 U.S. 9 Wall. 567 567 (1869) The Assessors v. Osbornes 76 U.S. (9 … The Assessors v. Osbornes - 76 U.S. 567 (1869) U.S. Supreme Court The Assessors v. Osbornes, 76 U.S. 9 Wall.

Vimochit Samaj Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Assessor ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(5)BomCR335; 2004(3)MhLj869

further modified and only 5 bungalows and 3 chawls were constructed in July, 1968. The petitioner-society approached the Assessor and Collector to carry out the assessment under their letter dated 31-12-1969. Notices were issued on 20-3-1973 and … the petitioner-society's property along with the warrants of attachment dated 11-8-1999 and 29-12-2000 to be bad in-law. The contention of the petitioners is that consequent to the said orders relating to the rateable value, the respondent-corporation has

Vithal A. Shetty and anr. Vs. Assessor and Collector, Kalyan Dombivli ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2001Bom407; 2001(4)BomCR305

Owners Assocatlon, Kalyan. They have challenged the Circular dated 16th March, 2001 issued by the Respondent-Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation issued pursuant to the resolution of the Corporation whereunder a decision has been taken that the water supply

National Institute of Public Finance and Policy and anr. Vs. the Asses ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 95(2002)DLT737; 2002(61)DRJ121

to residential premises. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had made representations to the Assessor and Collector for recalling of the impugned order dated 4.3.1994. The matter had been pending consideration before the … Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Rule. 2. With the consent of the parties writ petition is taken up for disposal. 3. The petitioner by this writ petition impugns

Vikram Murarka and anr. Vs. Assessor-collector (North-south) Division ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2006)2CALLT30(HC)

Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.1. The Court : In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of the impugned notices of hearing issued

Sukumar Chakraborty Vs. Assistant Assessor-collector and Others

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1991Cal181

28th June, 1988 issued by the Assistant Assessor-Collector, Ward No. 93, Tollygung Tax Department, of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation intimat-ing to the petitioner refusing to mutate his name in respect of Premises No. 1/345, Gariahat Road (345,

Kantilal Manilal Mehta Vs. Assessor and Collector Ahmedabad Municipal ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1977)18GLR1037

the premises in question are not 'buildings' within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and (2) that the respondent No. 2, Corporation, had not

Pran Krishna Kamar and anr. Vs. Junior Assessor, Sibarampore and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1954Cal241,58CWN73

Madhusudanpur and Kasinagore, in the 24 Parganas. The petitioners were served with notices in Form A by the Assessor-Inspector Kakdwip and the junior assessor Sitarampur. They filed declarations in Form B., sometime in 18-12-1952. In the declarations … 273 bighas 10 kottas and 4 chattaks were held and cultivated on their personal account, 99 taighas 5 cottas were held and cultivated, for the purposes of a debuttar and 60 bighas were held, and cultivated for

Khagendra Nath Vs. Junior Assessor, Procurement P.S. Sonarpur

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1953Cal719,57CWN684

time and noquestion, therefore, of applying Section 5 of the Limitation Act to the present cases arises or could have possibly arisen. This position, as we have already indicated, is not controverted by the State. These Rules