Co Ltd V V P - Judgment Search Results

V.V.P. Thangarajut Vs. K.V. Perumal Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1980Mad7

1. These second appeals. three in number. raise a common point. They arise out of suits for dissolution of partnership filed by a partner against his other partners … that date. Both the courts below, however, rejected this construction of the legal notices. I agree with their view. In the law of partnership, stoppage of the partnership business is one thing; dissolution of partnership is quite … 1. These second appeals. three in number. raise a common point. They arise out of suits for dissolution of partnership filed by a

V.V.P. Thangaraju Vs. K.V. Perumal Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)2MLJ469

V. Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. These second appeals, three in number, raise a, common point. They arise out of suits for dissolution of partnership filed by a partner against his other partners. … V. Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. These second appeals, three in number, raise a, common point. They arise out of suits for dissolution of partnership filed by a partner against his other partners. Two

K.V.V.P. Veettil Vellachi Vs. Gopalan

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1944Mad407

by the plaintiffs. Much of the argument of the learned Counsel for the appellants is based on Moithiyan v. Ayissa : AIR1928Mad870 followed in Ramunni v. Kunhayan : AIR1935Mad125 in which it was held that if property … partition agreement under which the tarwad property was divided into four lots. The one with which we are concerned fell to the share of a mother, plaintiff 1, and her son, the defendant. Plaintiff 1 had three … Horwill, J.1. Members of a tarwad entered into a rather unusual partition agreement under which the tarwad property was divided into four lots. The

P. Rajamani Gurukal Vs. T.V.V.P.P. Thirumaligai Sizyal Trust, Rep. by. ...

Court: Chennai

against the judgment and decree in A.S. No. 27 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Myladuthurai, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 192 of 1998 on the file of the District … the suit property. The defendant was duly intimated about the said agreement and he was called upon to vacate the house. The defendant was bargaining for time to vacate. Subsequently, the defendant instituted a suit for specific … decree in A.S. No. 27 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Myladuthurai, confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No. 192

M.D. Soujanya and anr. Vs. S.V.V.P.V.M.C. Mahila Vidya Peeth and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(2)ALD251; 2006(3)ALT394

provisions made in larger public interest. (Joginder Singh Sodhi v. Amar Kaur : (2005)1SCC31 ; Shalimar Tar Products Ltd v. H.C. Sharma : [1988]1SCR1023 and Pulin Behari Lal v. Mahadeb Dutta : [1993]1SCR472 . Further, the agreement said … grant-in-aid in terms of the provisions of the A.P. Private Educational Institutions Grant-in-aid (Regulations) Act, 1988 and seek consequential directions to the respondents to admit the said posts to grant-in-aid and for a further direction to the