Clocks - Judgment Search Results

Southern Clock Industries Vs. Regional Joint Labour Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2003(3)KLT931; (2004)ILLJ628Ker

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Whether the Kerala Industrial Employees' Payment of Gratuity Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'Kerala Act') is applicable after the enactment of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the...

Victor Clock Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. The contention of the applicant that the duty and penalty in question have already been deposited appears to be correct on the copy of the TR6 challan dated 2.5.2001 and the extract of the RG23A...

Galaxy Clocks Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT378Tri(Mum.)bai

Matched in: Parties Galaxy Clocks Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(15)LC57Tri(Delhi)

also directly sell their meters to Industrial consumers like Bajaj Auto Limited. Shri U.V.Vaidya, Managing Director of Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. thereinafter referred to as Diamond) holds about 12% of shares in Diamond and 75%

Bifora Clock Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1995)(75)ELT891Tri(Chennai)

Bangalore. Under the impugned order the appellants have been charged with non-accountal in statutory records 1638 pieces of clocks valued at Rs. 3,10,857/-. The authorities also found unaccounted quantity of 1226 watch movements valued at Rs. 71,108.

The Assistant Collector of Customs and ors. Vs. Dutex Clock Company

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC1747; (1972)2SCC67; 1973(5)LC151(SC)

imported by the respondent, Dutext Clock Company, from Japan is to be fixed. The respondent, a manufacturer of clocks, imported 87 cases of steel strips of Japanese origin for its manufacturing business. Those cases were shipped per

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT342Tri(Mum.)bai

a First Respondent) is a Partnership Firm with 12 Partners engaged inter alia, in the manufacture of wall clocks. They had been selling the clocks to approximately 70 independent wholesale dealers situated throughout the country. Apart from

R.S.Champalal Vijaychand Sariya (Huf) Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

predecessors in title of the respondent No.2, are engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing of wall clocks, wrist watches and hierological instruments under the honestly adopted AJANTA as part of trading style as well as

Parker and Whipple Company Vs. Yale Clock Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

holding the circuit court, that we adopt his language, as follows: "At the date of the invention, expensive clocks of tiny size were being made which met with favor from the public. They were convenient and attractive,

M/S. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Matched in: Parties M/S. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.