Clocking - Judgment Search Results

Southern Clock Industries Vs. Regional Joint Labour Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2003(3)KLT931; (2004)ILLJ628Ker

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Whether the Kerala Industrial Employees' Payment of Gratuity Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'Kerala Act') is applicable after the enactment of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the...

Victor Clock Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. The contention of the applicant that the duty and penalty in question have already been deposited appears to be correct on the copy of the TR6 challan dated 2.5.2001 and the extract of the RG23A...

Galaxy Clocks Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT378Tri(Mum.)bai

registration on 7-4-2000 on account of introduction of full exemption to finished goods (clocks) manufactured by them. The clocks were again subjected to duty in 2001-2002 with effect from 1-3-2001. The appellants therefore claimed that the credit,

Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)(15)LC57Tri(Delhi)

also directly sell their meters to Industrial consumers like Bajaj Auto Limited. Shri U.V.Vaidya, Managing Director of Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. thereinafter referred to as Diamond) holds about 12% of shares in Diamond and 75%

Bifora Clock Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1995)(75)ELT891Tri(Chennai)

Bangalore. Under the impugned order the appellants have been charged with non-accountal in statutory records 1638 pieces of clocks valued at Rs. 3,10,857/-. The authorities also found unaccounted quantity of 1226 watch movements valued at Rs. 71,108.

The Assistant Collector of Customs and ors. Vs. Dutex Clock Company

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC1747; (1972)2SCC67; 1973(5)LC151(SC)

of time at which the rate of duty with respect to the goods imported by the respondent, Dutext Clock Company, from Japan is to be fixed. The respondent, a manufacturer of clocks, imported 87 cases of steel

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT342Tri(Mum.)bai

1. M/s. Ajanta Transistor Clock Manufacturing Co. (hereinafter referred to as a First Respondent) is a Partnership Firm with 12 Partners engaged inter

R.S.Champalal Vijaychand Sariya (Huf) Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

registered trade mark AJANTA, in the name of Manubhai Ukabhai Patel and others trading as M/s Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. Company, under No.535953B as of 27.8.1990 in respect of the goods included in class 3. The Trade

Parker and Whipple Company Vs. Yale Clock Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Parker & Whipple Company v. Yale Clock Co. - 123 U.S. 87 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Parker & Whipple Company v. Yale Clock Co., 123

M/S. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1217-1218 OF2017....Appellant(s) ....Respondent(s) M/s. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. :Versus: The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. A.M. Khanwilkar, J.JUDGMENT1 The appellant filed a complaint