Clocking - Judgment Search Results
Southern Clock Industries Vs. Regional Joint Labour Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-21-2003
Reported in: 2003(3)KLT931; (2004)ILLJ628Ker
J.B. Koshy, J.1. Whether the Kerala Industrial Employees' Payment of Gratuity Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as 'Kerala Act') is...
Victor Clock Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-11-2001
1. The contention of the applicant that the duty and penalty in question have already been deposited appears to be...
Galaxy Clocks Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-08-2004
Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT378Tri(Mum.)bai
full exemption to finished goods (clocks) manufactured by them. The clocks were again subjected to duty in 2001-2002 with effect from
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co. Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-30-1987
Reported in: (1988)(15)LC57Tri(Delhi)
like Bajaj Auto Limited. Shri U.V.Vaidya, Managing Director of Diamond Clock Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd. thereinafter referred to as Diamond) holds
Bifora Clock Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Oct-27-1993
Reported in: (1995)(75)ELT891Tri(Chennai)
been charged with non-accountal in statutory records 1638 pieces of clocks valued at Rs. 3,10,857/-. The authorities also found unaccounted quantity
The Assistant Collector of Customs and ors. Vs. Dutex Clock Company
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-1972
Reported in: AIR1972SC1747; (1972)2SCC67; 1973(5)LC151(SC)
with respect to the goods imported by the respondent, Dutext Clock Company, from Japan is to be fixed. The respondent, a
Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-23-2001
Reported in: (2002)(139)ELT342Tri(Mum.)bai
1. M/s. Ajanta Transistor Clock Manufacturing Co. (hereinafter referred to as a First Respondent) is
R.S.Champalal Vijaychand Sariya (Huf) Vs. Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Dec-12-2008
Manubhai Ukabhai Patel and others trading as M/s Ajanta Transistor Clock Mfg. Company, under No.535953B as of 27.8.1990 in respect of
Parker and Whipple Company Vs. Yale Clock Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-31-1887
Parker & Whipple Company v. Yale Clock Co. - 123 U.S. 87 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Parker
M/S. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. Vs. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1217-1218 OF2017....Appellant(s) ....Respondent(s) M/s. Sonell Clocks and Gifts Ltd. :Versus: The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free