Client Lay - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Gouri Phani Chakraborty Vs. Governing Body of Krishnanagar Women' ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)2CALLT212(HC)

..... the word meanwhile can be construed the interregnum period but it is not for the lay clients to understand such import by citing paragraph 15 of another supreme court judgment reported in .....

Sebi Vs. Intec Share and Stock Brokers

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... cause notice cites 6 transactions at annexure m which are client to client albm transactions in settlement number 2001010 and 2001011 it ..... cause notice cites 6 transactions at annexure m which are client to client albm transactions in settlement number 2001010 and 2001011 it ..... which clearly lays down as to what are the expenses that can be met from the client s account debiting of clients account for .....

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. Cavinkare Limited and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004CriLJ349

..... usual method i dismiss all the applications of mr gupta s client for discharge of rule or for other reliefs therefore the rule ..... be advised naturally the application already filed by mr chatterjee s client for chemical test of the sample collected by the special officer ..... chakraborty s client in terms of the agreement the decisions cited by mr gupta in support of his contention do not lay down that .....

P. Gyan Chander Vs. Secunderabad Cantonment Board and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(6)ALD65

..... the land in question was sold by the society to his client and petitioner has no right over the property learned standing counsel ..... 283 of the act the cantonment board has made secunderabad cantonment laying out of streets and regulation and prohibition of erection of ..... of cantonments act 1924 and bye law 14 of secunderabad cantonment laying out of streets and regulation and prohibition of erection of .....

Brown Vs. Legal Foundation of Wash.

Court: US Supreme Court

have a professional and fiduciary obligation to avoid commingling their clients money with schwartz and john d echeverria for aarp et

Kulwant Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2004CriLJ2217

orderm m kumar j 1 this petition filed by a life convict under section 482 of the code of criminal...

Kishore Rajaram Chhabria Vs. the Chairman Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)46SCL385SAT

..... any of their associates for and on behalf of discretionary investment clients during an offer period shall be notified to the stock exchange ..... provisions of the statute and the 1994 regulations so as to lay down the correct interpretation and the frontiers of jurisdiction of the ..... out the purposes of the act is a general delegation without laying down any guideline it can not be exercised as to bring .....

India Cements Investment Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)42SCL563SAT

was not restricted to the failure to obtain the broker client agreement in terms of regulation 4 3 1 of nse

Prakash K. Shah Shares and Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)3CompLJ275SAT

client registration form and enter into an agreement with the client further the sub broker is also responsible for scrip level

Sharedeal Financial Consultants Vs. Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)4CompLJ148SAT

it is observed that in settl no 50 the aforesaid client of the broker member had a payment obligation of rs