Client Lay - Judgment Search Results

Cooke Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in this fond hope i was mistaken also my client desired the privilege of laying the whole facts before your honor in an ..... enough to overcome his personal prejudice against petitioner s client and that the client would have the privilege of rebutting the whispered slanders ..... hands which had not been submitted to the petitioner or his client when walker questioned this the court directed the marshal to .....

Askaran Choutmal Vs. the E.i.Ry. Co.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1925)ILR52Cal386

the legal profession that the relation of counsel to their clients should be fully appreciated the more so inasmuch as the

Yeiser Vs. Dysart

Court: US Supreme Court

attorney at law be suspended unless he refund to a client a fee received and paid in violation of a provision

Ved and Sopher Vs. R.P. Wagle and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1925Bom351; (1925)27BOMLR556

..... obtain a charging order in respect of all the property of his client recovered through his exertions whether it was real or personal property it ..... not exist when moneys are once distributed to the creditors of the client section 31 4 since repealed tarun chatterjee h l dattu jj ..... 1890 15 app cas 452 and in my opinion shippey v grey lays down the correct principle and is in no way in conflict with .....

Veerappa Chettiar (Minor) and ors. Vs. P.G. Sundaresa Sastrigal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1925Mad1201; (1925)49MLJ366

person whose interest is opposed to that of his former client provided that the consent of the party shall be presumed

Veerappa Chettiar and ors. Vs. P.G. Sundaresa Sastrigal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.300

being misunderstood if a pleader advises or acts for a client he should not appear against him in any subsequent proceeding

Burjor F.R. Joshi Vs. Ellerman City Lines Limited

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1925Bom449; (1925)27BOMLR1098

1925 the plaintiff s solicitors replied we have seen our client and are instructed to state that our client will proceed

In Re: Venugopal Naydu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.896

vakil should be taken before the security case against his client has been disposed of legal practitioners act xviii of 1879

In Re: Venugopal Nayudu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad1044

vakil should be taken before the security case against his client has been disposed of t n district police act 1859

In Re: Mr. B. Muniswami Naidu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 96Ind.Cas.685

of any proved loss in consequence of it by the client but it has been laid down clearly in england in