Client Lay - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: client lay Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 556 results (0.292 seconds)Ranipet Chemicals and Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Swastik Stainless ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-03-1985
Reported in: AIR1986Cal76
..... suit there was latches negligence and inaction on his part for which the appellant a lay client should not suffer it is now well settled that for the latches and or negligence ..... and or default on the part of the lawyer a lay client should not suffer in this connection reference may be made to the cases of jaipur .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalyan Kumar Basak Vs. Salil Kumar Basak and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-23-1985
Reported in: AIR1986Cal298,1986(1)CHN81,(1988)2CompLJ248(Cal)
..... which are required to be taken by him it is well settled that when a lay client has taken all steps in the matter of conducting the proceeding in court then he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Land and Finance Universal Ltd. and ors. Vs. Arjun Singh and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-1985
Reported in: AIR1986Delhi381; 1986(10)DRJ200
..... for selling property to the company a solicitor purchasing property from a client and so on none of the cases are even remotely close ..... were sold to various persons for building their private houses in the lay out plan of the colony certain land had been set aside ..... to build a public building there is thereforee no infringement of the lay out plan involved in the present case 22 the whole contention .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTExpress Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-05-1985
Reported in: 1985(2)SCALE1073,(1986)1SCC259
..... passed on the letters to the petitioner jagmohan who was not their client at all advance copies of this petition laying emphasis on the aforesaid two letters of counsel appearing for other parties ..... second letter shri m c bhandare writes to shri b p maheshwari and states your clients the municipal corporation of delhi have enquired from you as to how his lordship mr .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. Shamsher Singh Bedi and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-12-1985
Reported in: 1986CriLJ293
..... 80 civil procedure code claiming damages the notice is as under my client sh gurdial singh sarpanch son of shri sewa singh resident ..... division bench of patna high court reported in air1969pat194 clearly lays down that for a tort of false imprisonment judicial officers ..... division bench of patna high court reported in air1969pat194 clearly lays down that for a tort of false imprisonment judicial officers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShameshwar Prasad Bhargava and ors. Vs. Kulwant Rai Jam and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-1985
Reported in: 29(1986)DLT331; 1986(10)DRJ245
g c jain j 1 this order shall also dispose the connected appeal no 404 79 s c bhargam v...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZauderer Vs. Office of Disc. Counsel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-28-1985
an attorney advertising a contingent fee must disclose that a client may be liable for costs even if the lawsuit is their professional expertise to overpower the will and judgment of laypeople who have not sought their advice while it is true
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWebb Vs. Bd. of Educ. of Dyer County
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-17-1985
of normal billing judgment be properly billed to one s client brief for petitioner 19 quoting hensley v eckerhart 461 u
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevichand Bastimal and Bhanwarlal Manakchand Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-24-1985
Reported in: (1985)49CTR(Raj)43; [1985]156ITR166(Raj); 1985(1)WLN616
rule out cases of business or commercial courtesy extended to clients who visit the businessmen for the purpose of doing business
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrikaprasad Vs. State of M.P. Through Chief Sec. M.P.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-1985
Reported in: AIR1985MP254
client s case and in the instant case even the client s case is not served it is equally his duty
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial