Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Cleaner - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 27 1990

Catering Cleaners of Southern Railways Vs. Chief Commericial Supdt., S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-27-1990

Reported in: AIR1991SC26; 1990LabIC1936; (1998)IIILLJ747SC

ORDER1. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and gone through the directions issued by this Court in its judgment dated February 4, 1987 reported in 1987 Lab IC 619, we are of the opinion that...


Feb 04 1987

Catering Cleaners of Southern Railway Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-04-1987

Reported in: AIR1987SC777; [1987(54)FLR476]; JT1987(1)SC376; 1987LabIC619; (1987)ILLJ345SC; 1987(1)SCALE240; (1987)1SCC700; [1987]2SCR164; 1987(2)SLJ23(SC); 1987(1)LC560(SC)

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. The petitioners describe themselves as 'catering cleaners of Southern Railways represented by V. China Thambi and M.Mohan of the Vegetarian Refreshment Room, Central Station, Madras'.


Mar 30 1993

Ambassador Dry Cleaners Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Mar-30-1993

Reported in: [1994]210ITR292(Raj)

Inder Sen Israni, J.1. Briefly stated, a writ petition was filed by the petitioner, which came up for orders on second stay application on May 17, 1991 . No reply, as yet, had been filed by...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 17 1991

Ambassador Dry Cleaners Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-17-1991

Reported in: [1991]192ITR487(Raj)

I.S. Israni, J.1. The matter has come up on a second stay application.2. It is submitted by learned counsel that the stay order was passed by this court on March 26, 1991. However, the penalty order/demand...


May 01 1962

Glamour Cleaners Vs. Chandrakant Chhotalal Gandhi and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: May-01-1962

Reported in: (1962)3GLR941

of Anand Niwas Private Limited while two shops on the ground floor were in the possession of Glamour Cleaners and Vithaldas Panchal. The trustees could therefore obtain possession only of the remaining portion of the ground floor


Sep 21 2000

Amar Dry Cleaner Vs. Mrs. Kamal Gupta and Another

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Sep-21-2000

the complainant respondent Mrs. Kamal Gupta had given one saire of pista green colour to the appellant Dry cleaners for dry cleaning. After the saree was Dry cleaned by the appellant, the complainant found that the saree


Dec 08 1998

Best Dry Cleaners and Dyers Vs. Bela Handa

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Dec-08-1998

Member: 1. On a complaint instituted by Smt. Bela Handa, a resident of Chandigarh against the respondent Dry Cleaner for claiming compensation for the damaged shirt, the District Forum-II, Chandigarh ordered on 29.7.1998 that the complainant was


Nov 05 1997

Chawla Dry Cleaners Vs. Davinder Singh Jamwal

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on: Nov-05-1997

Mrs. P. Ojha, Member: 1. The complainant hired the services of Chawla Dry Cleaners, Dyers and Darners for getting one woollen suit (navy blue) consisting of one coat and one pant, two


May 23 1932

Atlantic Cleaners and Dyers, Inc. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-1932

Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United States - 286 U.S. 427 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers,


Sep 11 1997

Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Triplex Dry Cleaners and Or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-11-1997

Reported in: [1999(81)FLR20]; JT1998(8)SC136; (1998)IIMLJ32(SC); (1998)1SCC196

ORDER1. The short question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether Respondent 1 (hereinafter to be referred to as the respondent) is an establishment within the meaning of that expression under the Employees' State...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial