Clauses A - Judgment Search Results
Veer Vardhman Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Claus Hirschburger Gmbh
Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on: Sep-06-2002
Reported in: II(2003)CPJ19MRTP
loss suffered by the applicant, due to alleged adoption of unfair trade practices by the respondent namely, M/s. Claus Hirschburger GmbH.2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the applicant which is a company registered under
Sukhdev Singh, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Life Insurance Corporat ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-21-1975
Reported in: AIR1975SC1331; [1975(30)FLR283]; 1975LabIC881; (1975)ILLJ399SC; (1975)1SCC421; [1975]3SCR619
The conclusion of the High Court that Corporation should not be permitted to enforce the regulations mentioned in Clauses (1) and (4) of Regulation 25 is upheld.71. In Civil Appeal No. 115 of 1974, the judgment of
In Re: the City Municipal Act, Iv of 1919 and of Section 99 Clause 2 t ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-20-1924
Reported in: 84Ind.Cas.842
adopted by the Council' shall make adequate and suitable provision for each of the matters referred to in Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 155, Sub-section (2)' Section 158 refers to the Council finally passing the budget estimate … force in that year. On page 10 of the printed budget the heading 'Municipal rates and taxes' comprises Clauses (a) to (h), the tax on properties being Clauses (b) to (g). They give the percentage. Having regard to
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free