Civil Service - Judgment Search Results

Punjab Civil Service (Executive Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2005)(2)SLJ256CAT

details. In P.M. Bayas's case, the officers of Maharashtra State Civil Services challenged the selection of W.G. Gurde and P.M. Bayas Service. The suitability of a person for appointment to the service shall be determined by scrutiny of service records and personal

Afhq Civil Service (Direct Recruit Gazetted) Officers

Court: Delhi

(Senior Civil Staff Officer/Joint Director)(d) Civil Staff Officer/Deputy Director(e) Assistant Civilian Staff Officer/Section Officer (initially designated as Superintendent) (f) AssistantRule 16 in that case the scheme in force relating to the services for fixing inter se seniority took into account the filling

Arunachal Pradesh Civil Service Officers' Association Vs. State of Aru ...

Court: Guwahati

Writ Petitioner in the case, an Association of Arunachal Pradesh Civil Service Officers comprising of more than 300 members, hereinafter referred Pradesh that Recruitment Rules with regard to most of the services under the Government of Arunachal Pradesh have been finalised. In

Civil Services Officers Institute Vs. Dargah Panch Peer and ors.

Court: Delhi

were the party. The case of the applicant before the Civil Court was that the land measuring 3 bigha 16 biswas FAO NO.258 OF 200.Decided on :20. h February, 2013 CIVIL SERVICES OFFICERS INSTITUTE Appellant Through: Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Jagrati Singh,

Oklahoma Vs. United States Civil Service Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

611(c), to review an order of the United States Civil Service Commission determining that a State Highway Commissioner had engaged Hatch Act, 18 U.S.C. 611, the United States Civil Service Commission determined that these activities constituted taking an "active part

Ramesh K. Sharma and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: RLW2001(1)SC11; 2000(7)SCALE584; [2000]Supp5SCR34; (2001)1UPLBEC542

not so defined, as defined or constituted by the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control, and Appeal) Rules, 1958; (c) 'Committee' means unit under an Appointing Authority and the employees of the service/cadre of the new department, for promotion to higher post in

Lrs. of Late Shri Pukhraj Gehlot Vs. the Rajasthan Civil Services Appe ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2007(2)Raj1204

is allowed. The judgment dated 18.2.2003 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal is quashed. The appeal preferred by the also quashed. Late Shri Pukhraj Gehlot shall be treated in service upto the date of his death i.e. 3.12.2005. The legal

Ajay Singh and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal an ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj1293; 2003(2)WLC559

expressed that since he has pronounced a decision in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2968/2000 that day, these petitions required to added under Rule 28-B sub Clause (11) of Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954 on 30.10.1991. After the aforesaid explanation was added,

State of Rajasthan Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Ja ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2000WLC(Raj)UC144

is no reason to disbelieve the said statement. The Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scale) Rules, 1976 clearly provided in Rule filed by the respondent No. 2 after interpreting Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scales) Rules, 1976. We have perused the operative

Karni Dan Vs. Raj. Civil Service Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(1)Raj413; 2002(3)WLC263; 2002(3)WLN678

filed against the order dated 12.5.2000 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal by which the order of compulsory retirement special circumstances by holding the selection process dehors Sikkim State Service Rules, 1977 but it was purported to have been made