Civil Service - Judgment Search Results

Afhq Civil Service (Direct Recruit Gazetted) Officers Overruled

Court: Delhi

of a copy of this order. No costs.6. Aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the AFHQ (DRs) Civil Service Officers' Association filed Writ Petition No. 4058 of 2002, the Union of India filed separate Writ Petition No. … instructions as there were no statutory rules governing the service. On 1st March 1968, the Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") were framed, wherein the services are classified in the following

Civil Services Officers Institute Vs. Dargah Panch Peer and ors.

Court: Delhi

* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO NO.258 OF 200.Decided on :20. h February, 2013 CIVIL SERVICES OFFICERS INSTITUTE Appellant Through: Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Jagrati Singh, Adv. Versus DARGAH PANCH PEER & ORS. … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO NO.258 OF 200.Decided on :20. h February, 2013 CIVIL SERVICES OFFICERS INSTITUTE Appellant Through: Mr.Parag P.Tripathi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Jagrati Singh, Adv. Versus DARGAH PANCH PEER & ORS. Respondents

Arunachal Pradesh Civil Service Officers' Association Vs. State of Aru ...

Court: Guwahati

time.Sd/-Chiet Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh.' 3. The Writ Petitioner in the case, an Association of Arunachal Pradesh Civil Service Officers comprising of more than 300 members, hereinafter referred to as APCS, has contended that the post of

Punjab Civil Service (Executive Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2005)(2)SLJ256CAT

recruitment to IAS as laid down in Rule 4(i), namely: (b) By promotion of substantive member of State Civil Service (for short 'SCS (EB) Officers'); and (c) By selection, in special cases from amongst persons who held in … gazetted posts in connection with the affairs of a State and who are not members of a State Civil Service, (hereinafter referred to as "non-SCS Officer") Rule 8 deals with the recruitment by promotion or selection. Rule 8(1)

Ramesh K. Sharma and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: RLW2001(1)SC11; 2000(7)SCALE584; [2000]Supp5SCR34; (2001)1UPLBEC542

in a bunch of writ petitions, which had been filed against the judgment and order of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal in a bunch of appeals. The perennial problem of inter se seniority between the two … a bunch of writ petitions, which had been filed against the judgment and order of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal in a bunch of appeals. The perennial problem of inter se seniority between the two sources

Lrs. of Late Shri Pukhraj Gehlot Vs. the Rajasthan Civil Services Appe ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2007(2)Raj1204

rise to present petition are as follows:2. The Commissioner-cum-Secretary to the Government of Rajasthan, Department of Food and Civil Supply, by an order dated 29.11.2000 while exercising powers under Rule 53(1) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) … and Civil Supply, by an order dated 29.11.2000 while exercising powers under Rule 53(1) of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1996') compulsorily retired the petitioner in public interest.

Sohanveer Singh Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal and or ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2010(1)Raj178

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the judgment of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal dated 30.7.2002 whereby his appeal claiming stepping up of pay in terms of Rule- 4 … Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the judgment of the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal dated 30.7.2002 whereby his appeal claiming stepping up of pay in terms of Rule- 4 of

Kanjibhai Godadbhai Chaudhary Vs. Gujarat Civil Services Tribunal and ...

Court: Gujarat

the Special Civil Application No.18734 of 2011 is allowed. Judgment and order dated 18.5.2011 passed by the Gujarat Civil Service Tribunal in Appeal No.323 of 2008 insofar as the Tribunal has ordered remand of the matter to the

Hanif Khan vs.the Central Civil Services Board

Court: Delhi

6445/2016 1. HANIF KHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor & Ms. Rekha Giri, Advocates Versus THE CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES BOARD .... Respondent Through: Mr. A.P. Sahay, Central Government Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR … 1. HANIF KHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor & Ms. Rekha Giri, Advocates Versus THE CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES BOARD .... Respondent Through: Mr. A.P. Sahay, Central Government Standing Counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Creation

Ajay Singh and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal an ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj1293; 2003(2)WLC559

For this I would like to cite the proceedings taken in the case of Ajay Singh v. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal and Ors. (1)3. This writ petition was listed before this Court on 13.3.2000. On that … this I would like to cite the proceedings taken in the case of Ajay Singh v. Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal and Ors. (1)3. This writ petition was listed before this Court on 13.3.2000. On that date,