Civil Rights - Judgment Search Results
Civil Rights Vigilance Committee, S.L.S.R.C. College of Law, Bangalore ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-06-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Kant85; 1982(2)KarLJ208
appeal is from the order of Bopanna, J., dismissing writ petition No.25534 of 1981. The petitioner therein, namely, Civil Rights Vigilance Committee, has presented this appeal and for the sake of convenience, it will herein after be referred … presented this appeal and for the sake of convenience, it will herein after be referred to as 'the' Civil Rights Committee'.2. The material facts, leading up to this appeal, are briefly these : Geof Boycott and Geof Cook
Civil Rights Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1883
Civil Rights Cases - 109 U.S. 3 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) Civil Rights … Civil Rights Cases - 109 U.S. 3 (1883) U.S. Supreme Court Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) Civil Rights Cases Submitted October Term, 1882 Decided October 16th, 1888 109 U.S.
Smt. Mohini Devi Chopra and ors. Vs. Directorate of Civil Rights Enfor ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-14-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)KarLJ689
said communication issued by the Deputy Superintendent of Police to the Additional Director General of Police, Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement, it is stated that, on the basis of the application/complaint filed by respondents 4 and 5, an
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramachandrappa Erappa Kakkayanavar Vs. Civil Rights Enforcement Cell
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-13-1990
Reported in: ILR1990KAR2426; 1990(2)KarLJ156
client has taken steps to prosecute the defendant for impersonation and the matter has been referred to the Civil Rights Enforcement Cell. It may be open to the appellant to pursue that matter independently of the result of … hearing Counsel for the parties herein, THIS COURT DOTH in disposing of the appeal ORDER: (1) THAT the Civil Rights Enforcement cell be and is hereby directed to consider the question before it in accordance with the directions
Forum for Promotion of Quality Edun. Vs. Social Jurist, a Civil Right ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-14-2007
Matched in: Parties Forum for Promotion of Quality Edun. Vs. Social Jurist, a Civil Right Group and ors.
Delhi Citizen Forum for Civil Rights (Regd) vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-22-2019
DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11277/2019 % Date of decision:22. d October, 2019. DELHI CITIZEN FORUM FOR CIVIL RIGHTS (REGD) Through: Ms.Divya Ms.Joshini Tuli, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ Petitioner Jangid, Adv. with
Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Action Committee Unaided Recog ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
with Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Adv. for R-3/UOI. Mr. Vedanta Verma, Adv. AND + LPA No.769/2014 SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. Versus ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PVT. SCHOOLS & ORS ..... … in this regard is placed on a judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi 198(2013) DLT384 (x) that the Admission Order 2013 is contrary to
Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Action Committee Unaided Recog ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
with Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Adv. for R-3/UOI. Mr. Vedanta Verma, Adv. AND + LPA No.769/2014 SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Adv. Versus ACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED RECOGNIZED PVT. SCHOOLS & ORS ..... … in this regard is placed on a judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi 198(2013) DLT384 (x) that the Admission Order 2013 is contrary to
Social Jurist a Civil Rights Group Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-07-2015
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h May, 2015. % + W.P.(C) No.43/2006 SOCIAL JURIST A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal with Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF … the coming into force of the RTE Act. A Division Bench of this Court in Social Jurist, A Civil Rights Group Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi AIR2013Delhi 52 has held that the RTE Act is not applicable
Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Gnct and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2008
Reported in: 147(2008)DLT729; 2008(101)DRJ484
Matched in: Parties Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group Vs. Gnct and ors.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free