Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Cit V Best - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 24 2015

Cit-V Vs. Nortel Networks India a. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2015

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :24. 02.2015 + ITA1152015, C.M. APPL.3043/2015, 3044/2015 & 3045/2015 CIT-V ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus


Apr 30 2013

Commissioner Income Tax-v Vs. Nipuan Auto Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-30-2013

allowed the appeal of the assessee. In so far as the addition of ` 37,75,465/- is concerned, the CIT (Appeals) deleted the addition to the extent of ` 35,85,465/- which was essentially the unsecured loan received from … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2013 ITA 225/2013 COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX-V ..... Appellant versus NIPUAN AUTO PVT LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Sanjeev


Sep 06 2013

Cit V Vs. Nasa Finelease P Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2013

NEW DELHI + ITA No. 647/2012 Reserved on:27. h August, 2013 Date of Decision:6. h September, 2013 % CIT V Through Counsel. ....Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Versus NASA FINELEASE P LTD. Through Respondent Mr. Nageshwar Rao


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 05 2002

Cit-v Vs. Lagan Kala Upvan

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-05-2002

Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Del)243; 101(2002)DLT495; 2003(66)DRJ372; [2003]259ITR489(Delhi)

Section of the Act.5. Aggrieved, the assessed preferred appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) {(in short the CIT(A)}. The CIT(A), while allowing assessed's appeal and directing the Assessing Officer to allow exemption under Section 10 of … and Principal of the School namely, Shri G.C. Lagan in assessment year 1987-88, 1991-92 and 1992-93; (ii) its Vice Principal namely, Shri Bharat Bhushan and (iii) one Bal Vikas Public School, in which the said Shri G.C.


Dec 19 2003

Dy. Cit V.M/S Prakash Industries

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-19-2003

Reported in: (2004)88TTJ(Delhi)135

of Indian Tin Industries (P) Ltd., 166 ITR 454 (Kar). Further reliance was placed in the case of CIT v. Wesman Engneering Co. Ltd., 188 ITR 327 (SC). After considering the submissions and perusing other material on record,


Jul 11 2017

Rayban Sun Optics India Ltd. Vs.cit-V

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-11-2017

RAYBAN SUN OPTICS INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Nageshwar Rao, Advocate with Mr. Purushottam Anand, Advocate. versus CIT-V Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing ..... Respondent Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE


Dec 06 1995

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ramesh Malik Cit V. Smt. Kamini Malik ( ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-06-1995

Reported in: (1996)131CTR(MP)479

No. 4 that the order of the Tribunal is perverse. He placing reliance on Fakhri Automobiles vs . CIT 0043/1978 , argued that where the finding of the Tribunal is perverse, a question of law does arise … in cancelling the penalty instead of remitting it back to the Assessing Officer when the statutory notices were validly served and adequate opportunity was given to the assessee ?(iii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances


Aug 07 1992

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kishanchand (Also Cit V.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Decided on: Aug-07-1992

Reported in: (1993)45TTJ(JP.)20

Both these reference applications have been filed by the CIT, Jaipur.They involve inter-related issues and are in respect of a registered firm (R. A. No. 87/Jp/1992) and its … correct in holding that Sahi Bahi marked as Ex-C-28 did not belong to the assessee-firm, but the ownership vested with Shri Kishanchand, partner and consequently deleting the addition of Rs. 4,60,290 notwithstanding the fact that the Sahi


Sep 26 1996

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sakarlal Balabhai and Co. Ltd. and ors. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-1996

Reported in: (1997)139CTR(SC)499

PARIPOORNAN, J. :Special leave granted in S. L. P. Nos. 15006-15008 of 1992.2. The Revenue represented by the CIT, Gujarat at Ahmedabad, is the appellant in this batch of ten cases. The respondents are different assessees to … holding that while computing long-term capital gains on sale of shares, the bonus shares ought to have been valued at average cost for the purposes of computing the cost of acquisition ?'Civil Appeal No. 3358 of 1992'Whether


May 08 1997

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bankipur Club Ltd. (Cit V. Ranchi Club ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-08-1997

Reported in: (1997)140CTR(SC)102

cases including seven appeals which are de-linked can be classified into 5 groups. Group-A : C.A. Nos. 854-858/86 CIT v. Bankipur Club Ltd.; Group B : C.A. Nos. 505/92 and 3974/92 CIT v. Ranchi Club Ltd.; Group-C :


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial