Cit V Best - Judgment Search Results
Cit-V Vs. Nortel Networks India a. Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-24-2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :24. 02.2015 + ITA1152015, C.M. APPL.3043/2015, 3044/2015 & 3045/2015 CIT-V ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. Versus
Commissioner Income Tax-v Vs. Nipuan Auto Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
allowed the appeal of the assessee. In so far as the addition of ` 37,75,465/- is concerned, the CIT (Appeals) deleted the addition to the extent of ` 35,85,465/- which was essentially the unsecured loan received from … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2013 ITA 225/2013 COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX-V ..... Appellant versus NIPUAN AUTO PVT LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Sanjeev
Cit V Vs. Nasa Finelease P Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2013
NEW DELHI + ITA No. 647/2012 Reserved on:27. h August, 2013 Date of Decision:6. h September, 2013 % CIT V Through Counsel. ....Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Versus NASA FINELEASE P LTD. Through Respondent Mr. Nageshwar Rao
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit-v Vs. Lagan Kala Upvan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2002
Reported in: (2003)179CTR(Del)243; 101(2002)DLT495; 2003(66)DRJ372; [2003]259ITR489(Delhi)
Section of the Act.5. Aggrieved, the assessed preferred appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) {(in short the CIT(A)}. The CIT(A), while allowing assessed's appeal and directing the Assessing Officer to allow exemption under Section 10 of … and Principal of the School namely, Shri G.C. Lagan in assessment year 1987-88, 1991-92 and 1992-93; (ii) its Vice Principal namely, Shri Bharat Bhushan and (iii) one Bal Vikas Public School, in which the said Shri G.C.
Dy. Cit V.M/S Prakash Industries
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2003
Reported in: (2004)88TTJ(Delhi)135
of Indian Tin Industries (P) Ltd., 166 ITR 454 (Kar). Further reliance was placed in the case of CIT v. Wesman Engneering Co. Ltd., 188 ITR 327 (SC). After considering the submissions and perusing other material on record,
Rayban Sun Optics India Ltd. Vs.cit-V
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2017
RAYBAN SUN OPTICS INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Nageshwar Rao, Advocate with Mr. Purushottam Anand, Advocate. versus CIT-V Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing ..... Respondent Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ramesh Malik Cit V. Smt. Kamini Malik ( ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-06-1995
Reported in: (1996)131CTR(MP)479
No. 4 that the order of the Tribunal is perverse. He placing reliance on Fakhri Automobiles vs . CIT 0043/1978 , argued that where the finding of the Tribunal is perverse, a question of law does arise … in cancelling the penalty instead of remitting it back to the Assessing Officer when the statutory notices were validly served and adequate opportunity was given to the assessee ?(iii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kishanchand (Also Cit V.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Aug-07-1992
Reported in: (1993)45TTJ(JP.)20
Both these reference applications have been filed by the CIT, Jaipur.They involve inter-related issues and are in respect of a registered firm (R. A. No. 87/Jp/1992) and its … correct in holding that Sahi Bahi marked as Ex-C-28 did not belong to the assessee-firm, but the ownership vested with Shri Kishanchand, partner and consequently deleting the addition of Rs. 4,60,290 notwithstanding the fact that the Sahi
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sakarlal Balabhai and Co. Ltd. and ors. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-1996
Reported in: (1997)139CTR(SC)499
PARIPOORNAN, J. :Special leave granted in S. L. P. Nos. 15006-15008 of 1992.2. The Revenue represented by the CIT, Gujarat at Ahmedabad, is the appellant in this batch of ten cases. The respondents are different assessees to … holding that while computing long-term capital gains on sale of shares, the bonus shares ought to have been valued at average cost for the purposes of computing the cost of acquisition ?'Civil Appeal No. 3358 of 1992'Whether
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bankipur Club Ltd. (Cit V. Ranchi Club ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-08-1997
Reported in: (1997)140CTR(SC)102
cases including seven appeals which are de-linked can be classified into 5 groups. Group-A : C.A. Nos. 854-858/86 CIT v. Bankipur Club Ltd.; Group B : C.A. Nos. 505/92 and 3974/92 CIT v. Ranchi Club Ltd.; Group-C :
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free