Circuits - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: circuits Page 1 of about 60 results (0.017 seconds)Circuit City Stores, Inc. Vs. Adams
Court: US Supreme Court
Circuits answering in the affirmative,9 and the First and Sixth Circuits answering in the negative.lO Most of these cases neither involved
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElectronic Circuits Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1997)(91)ELT68TriDel
screening. The final product is printed circuit boards. The printed circuit boards cannot be manufactured without the assistance of screen of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinterstate Circuit Inc. Vs. City of Dallas
Court: US Supreme Court
OF DALLAS, 391 U.S. 53 (1968) 391 U.S. 53 INTERSTATE CIRCUIT, INC., ET AL. v. CITY OF DALLAS. ON PETITION FOR
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarasu Pictures Circuit (Pte.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ma ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [1963]50ITR82(Mad)
JAGADISAN J. - Messrs. Narasu Pictures Circuit Private Ltd., Madras, the assessees in this tax reference case,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinterstate Circuit, Inc. Vs. City of Dallas
Court: US Supreme Court
]" Ibid. Yet it should be repeated that the Interstate Circuit cases, unlike Roth and Alberts, involve merely the classification, not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinterstate Circuit, Inc. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
into consideration in the sale of subsequent runs that Interstate Circuit, Inc., will not agree to purchase produce to be exhibited
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinterstate Circuit, Inc. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
distributors had engaged in a conspiracy with the exhibitor, Interstate Circuit, Inc., and its officers in violation of the Anti-Trust Act,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGemini Pictures Circuit Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras.
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [1958]33ITR547(Mad)
to the points raised in the writ petition.The Gemini Pictures Circuit, Limited, Madras, a private limited company, is the assessee in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTravel Circuit Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
averring therein that the complainant is partner of M/s. Travel Circuit an IATA Accredited Agency and Director of M/s. Tumberline Trekking
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOpto Circuit India Ltd Vs. Axis Bank
Court: Karnataka
he was the Promoter, Chairman & Director of M/s Opto Circuits India Ltd (OCIL) which happens to be the first accused
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>