Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Cigar - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 23 1978

Bhagavathi Vilas Cigar Co. Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-23-1978

Reported in: (1979)IILLJ172Mad

leave which they were unable to take in the following circumstances.2. On 1st July, 1968, the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966, came into force. By a notification issued under Section 26 of that


Apr 06 1964

Standard Cigar Co. Vs. Tabacalera Severiano Jorge

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-06-1964

STANDARD CIGAR CO. v. TABACALERA SEVERIANO JORGE - 376 U.S. 780 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court STANDARD CIGAR CO. v. TABACALERA


Mar 03 1919

Compania General Vs. Alhambra Cigar Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-03-1919

Compania General v. Alhambra Cigar Co. - 249 U.S. 72 (1919) U.S. Supreme Court Compania General v. Alhambra Cigar Co., 249 U.S. 72


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 03 2013

Nico Quality Products Vs. Nc Arya Snuff Cigar Company

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-03-2013

REP. BY ITS PARTNER MR.K.C.VIJAY1T FLOOR, NO.4/1 KANDASWAMY ST CHANDRABAGH AVENUE MYLAPORE, CHENNAI4..PETITIONERS versus R-1 M/S.N.C.ARYA SNUFF AND CIGAR CO REP.BY ITS PARTNER S.CHANDRASEKARAN S.THARA V.ANURADHA19DAVIDSON ST CHENNAI01R-2 M/S.SAKTHI SNUFF CO MANUFACTURER FOR M/S.N.C.ARYA SNUFF AND CIGAR


Apr 09 2008

Mohammad Jani Basha Vs. Mrs. Mitra Tabacco Products, Lease Holders of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-09-2008

Reported in: 2008(4)ALD519; 2008(4)ALT9; [2008(118)FLR613]; (2008)IIILLJ1022AP

Court, under Section 2-A(2) of the ID Act, also raised, based on Section 31(2) of the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act 1966 (for short 'the 1966 Act'). Through its award, dated 4.7.2005, the Labour


Jun 09 2008

N. Mohammed Mohideen and Sahana Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Labour ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2008

Reported in: (2009)ILLJ177Mad; (2008)5MLJ6

denial of maternity relief was done by the petitioners even though their establishment is covered by Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966 [for short, 'Beedi and Cigar Act']. Section 37 of the Beedi and


Jun 09 2008

Management of D.C. Diwan Mohideen Beedi Factory Vs. Appellate Authorit ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-09-2008

Reported in: (2009)ILLJ616Mad

were directed against the order dated December 31, 1997 passed by the appellate authority under the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act 1966.2. W.P. No. 13254/1998 is filed by one Zulekha and 37 others against


Nov 04 1957

Pithapuram Taluk Tobacco, Cigars and Soda Merchants' Union Vs. State o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-04-1957

Reported in: [1958]9STC723(AP)

of Andhra Pradesh challenging the levy of sales tax at six pies per rupee on the turnover of cigars and cheroots sold at less than 0-2-0, bidies, snuff, chewing tobacco or any other product manufactured from tobacco,


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial