Ci - Judgment Search Results
Ra No. 83-ci of 2011 (Oandm) Vs. Ra No. 83-ci of 2011 (Oandm)
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
RA No.83-CI of 2011 -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH RA No.83-CI of 2011 (O&M) in...
Mac.App. 101/2012 Vs. Bhagwati Fabrics and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30th January, 2012 + MAC.APP. 101/2012 MEENA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate
C.K.Lohithakshan Vs. the Ci of Police
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.CIBI THOMAS RESPONDENTS: ----------------- 1. THE CI OF POLICE MATTANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Callistus Zacharia Vs. Ci of Police, Chavara
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
583. BY ADVS.SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE (SR.) SRI.V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS: ---------------------------------------------------- 1. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHAVARA
Kims Helthcare Management Limited Vs. Thiruvananthapuram Jilla Private ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
KK LANE, POTTAKUZHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY.2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, MEDICAL COLLEGE PO
Singaravelar Olympic Muthal Broadway Corner Varai Salaiyora Siru Kadai ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2016
Corporation of Chennai and the Additional Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Traffic to take necessary action to ensure that the area
P.K. Prajosh Vs. Union of India Represented by the Secretary, Ministry ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Mar-02-2012
of the service records, which is a divisional system for civilian staff, she has noted her marital status as 'widow'. The
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sakarlal Balabhai and Co. Ltd. and ors. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-1996
Reported in: (1997)139CTR(SC)499
P. Nos. 15006-15008 of 1992.2. The Revenue represented by the CIT, Gujarat at Ahmedabad, is the appellant in this batch of
M/S. Balabhagas Hulaschand Vs. State of OrissA. (Civil Appeals Nos. 44 ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-09-1975
Reported in: (1976)5CTR(SC)175
six appeals by the firm Balabhagas Hulaschand dealing in jute. Civil Appeal No. 449 of 1971 arises from the judgment of
Radhey Shyam Dixit Son of Late Raj Mangal Dixit Vs. the State of U.P. ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-01-2006
Reported in: [2006(110)FLR101]
service or even thereafter in accordance with rules. In such circumstances, this Court is of the firm opinion that no such
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free