Choultry - Judgment Search Results
Padmavati & Meenakshi Choultries Of Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-19-2021
D, ADVOCATE) 100 AND: AROON SAAB S/O YAKOOB SAAB AGED MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.10 VARASIDHI VINAYAKA LAYOUT APR CHOULTRY ROAD VANGASANDRA, 14TH CROSS MADIWALA POST BENGALURU - 560 068. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF
Sri Neelayamma Choultry Rep. by Its Manager, Sri B. Trimurthulu Vs. th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)ALT755
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a choultry registered under the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act (for short 'the Act'). It was
Palakurtivari Choultry Vs. District Collector and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-05-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD363; 2006(6)ALT205
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a Choultry. It is possessed of movable and immovable properties. An extent of Ac.6.09 cents of land in Survey Nos.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pasarlapudi Choultry, Rep. by Its Executive Officer Vs. Kadali Sriniva ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)ALT333
file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Razole.2. In all these Civil Revision Petitions, the unsuccessful plaintiff - Pasarlapudi Choultry - represented by its Executive Officer is the revision petitioner and different tenants under the Institution figure as
Avvaru Burraiah Choultry Vs. the Assistant Collector, Tenali and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-18-1977
Reported in: AIR1978AP313
and the schedule lands comprising an extent of Ac. 4.00 wet and 20 cents dry belong to the Choultry. The father of respondents 3 and 4 was the cultivating tenant of the schedule lands previously. As he
Nekkanti Satyanarayana Murthy Vs. Manne Nagammagari Choultry
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-10-2006
Reported in: AIR2006AP372; 2006(4)ALD299; 2006(4)ALT764
Subordinate Judge, Narsapur. The respondent in the Appeal is the plaintiff in the suit i.e., Sri Manne Nagammagari Choultry, Narsapur, represented by its Executive Officer.2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties hereinafter would be referred to
Telladala Ramakrishna Vs. Narayana Rangaiahgari Choultry and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALD713
the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments.8. WVMP No. 3445 of 2007 is filed by Sri Narayana Rangaiahgari Choultry-institution to vacate the interim order in WP MP No. 20221 of 2005 in WP No. 15921 of 2005
Chintala Uday Shankar and ors. Vs. Subedar Saheb Choultry, Trust Board ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-14-2006
Reported in: 2007(2)ALD213
representatives were not brought on record in the suit. The suit was originally filed by M/s. Subedar Saheb Choultry Trust Board represented by its President - Md. Raheem Khan and thereafter the name of Md. Raheem Khan
HussaIn Khan Vs. Yadavalli Choultry (Trust), Kothapeta and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-15-1992
Reported in: AIR1993AP323; 1993(1)ALT31
rival contentions, it is necessary to trace back few facts pertaining to the litigation. First respondent is a choultry (Trust) at Kothapeta, Guntur. Appellant is a tenant of suit premises, who was in occupation since 1969. It
Rani Thaiyal Nayagi Ammal Choultry Vs. S.Venkatesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-03-2012
The prayer made in the plaint to declare the suit property as belonging to Rani Thaiyal Nayagi Ammal Choultry Trust is outside the scope of Section 92 CPC, which dealt with public charity. No such relief is
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free