Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Choultry - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 19 2021

Padmavati & Meenakshi Choultries Of Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-19-2021

D, ADVOCATE) 100 AND: AROON SAAB S/O YAKOOB SAAB AGED MAJOR RESIDING AT NO.10 VARASIDHI VINAYAKA LAYOUT APR CHOULTRY ROAD VANGASANDRA, 14TH CROSS MADIWALA POST BENGALURU - 560 068. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF


Apr 28 2009

Sri Neelayamma Choultry Rep. by Its Manager, Sri B. Trimurthulu Vs. th ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-28-2009

Reported in: 2009(4)ALT755

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a choultry registered under the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act (for short 'the Act'). It was


Jul 05 2006

Palakurtivari Choultry Vs. District Collector and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-05-2006

Reported in: 2006(5)ALD363; 2006(6)ALT205

ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner is a Choultry. It is possessed of movable and immovable properties. An extent of Ac.6.09 cents of land in Survey Nos.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 04 2001

Pasarlapudi Choultry, Rep. by Its Executive Officer Vs. Kadali Sriniva ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-04-2001

Reported in: 2002(1)ALT333

file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Razole.2. In all these Civil Revision Petitions, the unsuccessful plaintiff - Pasarlapudi Choultry - represented by its Executive Officer is the revision petitioner and different tenants under the Institution figure as


Nov 18 1977

Avvaru Burraiah Choultry Vs. the Assistant Collector, Tenali and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-18-1977

Reported in: AIR1978AP313

and the schedule lands comprising an extent of Ac. 4.00 wet and 20 cents dry belong to the Choultry. The father of respondents 3 and 4 was the cultivating tenant of the schedule lands previously. As he


Mar 10 2006

Nekkanti Satyanarayana Murthy Vs. Manne Nagammagari Choultry

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-10-2006

Reported in: AIR2006AP372; 2006(4)ALD299; 2006(4)ALT764

Subordinate Judge, Narsapur. The respondent in the Appeal is the plaintiff in the suit i.e., Sri Manne Nagammagari Choultry, Narsapur, represented by its Executive Officer.2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties hereinafter would be referred to


Feb 28 2008

Telladala Ramakrishna Vs. Narayana Rangaiahgari Choultry and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-28-2008

Reported in: 2008(6)ALD713

the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments.8. WVMP No. 3445 of 2007 is filed by Sri Narayana Rangaiahgari Choultry-institution to vacate the interim order in WP MP No. 20221 of 2005 in WP No. 15921 of 2005


Nov 14 2006

Chintala Uday Shankar and ors. Vs. Subedar Saheb Choultry, Trust Board ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-14-2006

Reported in: 2007(2)ALD213

representatives were not brought on record in the suit. The suit was originally filed by M/s. Subedar Saheb Choultry Trust Board represented by its President - Md. Raheem Khan and thereafter the name of Md. Raheem Khan


Sep 15 1992

HussaIn Khan Vs. Yadavalli Choultry (Trust), Kothapeta and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-15-1992

Reported in: AIR1993AP323; 1993(1)ALT31

rival contentions, it is necessary to trace back few facts pertaining to the litigation. First respondent is a choultry (Trust) at Kothapeta, Guntur. Appellant is a tenant of suit premises, who was in occupation since 1969. It


May 03 2012

Rani Thaiyal Nayagi Ammal Choultry Vs. S.Venkatesan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-03-2012

The prayer made in the plaint to declare the suit property as belonging to Rani Thaiyal Nayagi Ammal Choultry Trust is outside the scope of Section 92 CPC, which dealt with public charity. No such relief is


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial