Chitty - Judgment Search Results
Chitti Prasada Rao and ors. Vs. Chitti Asiripolamma and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-1993
Reported in: I(1994)DMC253
B. Subhashan Reddy, J.This revision case arose out of the maintenance proceedings initiated by the mother i.e., the 1st respondent herein against her three sons invoking the provisions contained under Section 125 Cr. P.C. The maintenance...
B.Chitti B Vs. the Vice Chairman and Managing Director,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-13-2013
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.16620 OF201313-06-2013 B.Chitti Babu.Petitioner The Vice Chairman and Managing Director,APSRTC Bus Bhavan, Hyderabad and others..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sr.P.Venkateshwar Rao Counsel for respondent: Sr.Sunilkumar Reddy, Standing counsel...
Angamaly Chitty Fund(P)Ltd vs M.J.Saji
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-06-2024
Matched in: Parties Angamaly Chitty Fund(P)Ltd vs M.J.Saji
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kottukkal Chitties (P) Ltd Represented by Its Foreman vs Inspector Gen ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-27-2024
CHIT Exhibit-P-3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 06.10.2022 Exhibit-P-4 TRUE COPY OF COPIES OF A REGISTER OF CHITTY NUMBERS 208/2014 Exhibit-P-5 TRUE COPY OF A REGISTER OF CHITTY NUMBER 209/2014 Exhibit-P-6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION
Et Devassy Chitties Private Limited vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-09-2024
MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 20TH CHAITHRA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: ET DEVASSY CHITTIES PRIVATE LIMITED PALAYALAMAPARAMBU, THRISSUR 680 741,REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. BY ADV SRI.K.B.GANGESH RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED
Thundiyath Chitty Fund , Aranmula Represented by Its Sole Proprietor M ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-24-2023
Matched in: Parties Thundiyath Chitty Fund , Aranmula Represented by Its Sole Proprietor Mariyamma Varghese vs the State of Kerala
Kottukkal Chitties (P) Ltd vs District Registrar
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-03-2023
the chit subscriber with numbers 9, 36, 37 and 40 were excluded and substitutes were not recorded in Chitty No.208/14 and chit subscribers with numbers 20,22,32,35,36,39 and 40 were excluded and the substitutes were not recorded in
Ernakulam District Chitty Formans Association vs the Union of India
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-12-2023
Matched in: Parties Ernakulam District Chitty Formans Association vs the Union of India
All Kerala Chitty Foremen'S Association vs the Union of India,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-11-2023
Matched in: Parties All Kerala Chitty Foremen'S Association vs the Union of India,
All Kerala Chitty Foremen'S Association vs the Union of India
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-11-2023
Matched in: Parties All Kerala Chitty Foremen'S Association vs the Union of India
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free