Chinese - Judgment Search Results
Chinese Tannery Owners' Association and Ors. Vs. Makhan Lal and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-11-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Cal560
credit for three lacs seventy four thousand and sixty three rupees said to have been received from the Chinese Tannery Owners' Association, appellant No. 1 before us and defendant No. 2 in the suit. Defendant No. 3
Overseas Chinese Cuisine (India) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-01-1996
us the additions sustained and the relief granted by the first appellate authority.5. The assessee runs a leading Chinese restaurant in a prime area of this megametropolis which is known as "Chinese Garden".6. The premises of the
Overseas Chinese Cuisine Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-01-1996
Reported in: (1996)56ITD67(Mum.)
assail before us the additions sustained and the relief granted by the first appellate authority.Assessee runs a leading Chinese Restaurant in a prime area of this megametropolis which is known as 'Chinese Garden'.4. The premises of the
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Russo-chinese Bank Vs. National Bank of Commerce
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-05-1916
Russo-Chinese Bank v. National Bank of Commerce - 241 U.S. 403 (1916) U.S. Supreme Court Russo-Chinese Bank v. National Bank of Commerce, 241 U.S. 403 (1916) Russo-Chinese Bank v. National Bank of Commerce of Seattle, Washington...
The Chinese Exclusion Case
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-13-1889
The Chinese Exclusion Case - 130 U.S. 581 (1889) U.S. Supreme Court The Chinese Exclusion Case, 130 U.S. 581 (1889)
The Pei May Chinese High School and Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-18-2017
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side WP391of 2016 The Pei May Chinese High School & Anr. -Vs.The State of West Bengal With WP518of 2016 Liang Miao Sheng & ORS.-Vs.The State
M/S.Chiyang Chinese Restaurant vs Rajeendran P
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-23-2024
10/1/2023 IN I.A.1/2022 IN RCP 36/2022 OF III ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF AND RENT CONTROL COURT, ERNAKULAM PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS: 1 M/S.CHIYANG CHINESE RESTAURANT, 37/712, SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN ROAD, KADAVANTHARA, KOCHI REP.BY MANAGING PARTNER E.K.ANTONY, PIN - 682020 2 E.K.ANTONY, AGED 87
G.K. Raju, Afle (Chinese) Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2006
1. In this second round of litigation, applicant challenges impugned memorandum dated 10.05.2006, reiterating earlier transfer order.Applicant also challenges Memorandum dated 15.05.2006 enclosing aforesaid Memorandum dated 10.05.2006, as the same could not be served upon him...
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Venkateswara Bar and Restaurant
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-09-1996
Reported in: [1997]104STC360(AP)
ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. The question that is canvassed in these tax revision cases, filed by the State, is whether purchase tax is leviable under section 6-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free