Chief Election Commissioner - Judgment Search Results
The Chief Election Commissioner Of India Vs. M.r. Vijayabhaskar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-2021
INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1767 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.6731 of 2021) The Chief Election Commissioner of India ....Appellant Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar & Ors. ....Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment
Chief Election Commissioner Etc. Vs. Jan Chaukidar (Peoples Watch) and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3040-3041 OF 200.The Chief Election Commissioner Etc. … Petitioners Versus Jan Chaukidar (Peoples Watch) & Ors. … Respondents ORDER These are appeals by way
Chief Election Commissioner Vs. Sat Pal and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-1993
Reported in: 1993(2)SCALE993; 1994Supp(1)SCC150
Matched in: Parties Chief Election Commissioner Vs. Sat Pal and ors.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Venkataramaiah Vs. Chief Election Commissioner
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-24-1995
Reported in: ILR1995KAR1821; 1995(3)KarLJ433
Section 19 of the Act. He relies on the Decision of Supreme Court in MOHINDER SINGH GILL v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER : [1978]2SCR272 , in support of his contention.6. Section 19 of the Panchayath Raj Act lays down the
The Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-1994
Reported in: 1995(1)ALT28
Matched in: Parties The Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, Mla, Telugu Desam and ors.
The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Vs. Dr. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-1994
Reported in: 1994(3)ALT653
risking the lives of several innocent people. With regard to the role of the first respondent viz., the Chief Election Commissioner, it is stated in paragraph (8) as follows:'The first respondent though very famous for his prompt action, is … that armed security officers have been provided to the candidates round the clock. It is stated that the Chief Election Commissioner has appointed 20 observers who are highly placed Government Officials to cover these four districts and all these
Ajit Singh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-1989
Reported in: AIR1989SC2255; [1989(59)FLR713]; JT1989(3)SC746; 1989LabIC2085; 1989(2)SCALE671; (1989)4SCC704; [1989]Supp1SCR249; 1990(1)LC276(SC); (1990)1UPLBEC169
the Deputy Election Commissioner under whom he was working relinquished charge of office.2. The first respondent is the Chief Election Commissioner. One Tilak Raj was the Private Secretary to the first respondent. On the said Tilak Raj being promoted … respondent. On the said Tilak Raj being promoted as Under Secretary, the post of Private Secretary to the Chief Election Commissioner fell vacant and it was not filled in forthwith. However, by an order dated October 23, 1979 respondent
Ram Deo Bhandari, J. William John Alias Gandeevan, T.N. Seshan, Gautam ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC852; 1995(1)CTC273; JT1995(1)SC671; 1995(1)SCALE178; (1995)2SCC153; [1995]1SCR321
with its direction for the supply of identity cards. On the other hand Shri Bhat contended that the Chief Election Commissioner had failed to appreciate the economic as well as the social conditions in Bihar and without taking into … for West Bengal, who was in court, stated that as far as his State Government is concerned, the Chief Election Commissioner had gone to the length of saying that failure to implement his order would tantamount to a break
Amar Pal Singh Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-13-1993
Matched in: Parties Amar Pal Singh Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner of India
Mohinder Singh Gill and anr. Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner, New ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-02-1977
Reported in: AIR1978SC851; (1978)1SCC405; [1978]2SCR272
the declaratory part of the election, the appellant, along with a former Minister of the State, met. the Chief Election Commissioner (i.e. the Commission) at about 10.30 A.M. on March 22nd, with the request that he should direct the … report- we need not probe the reasons for the hurry-the Commission issued the order cancelling the poll. The Chief Election Commissioner has filed a laconic affidavit leaving to the Secretary of the Commission to go into the details of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free