Cherishment - Judgment Search Results
Cherish George vs Union of India Rep.by the (Secretary to Government o ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-13-2024
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945 PETITIONER: CHERISH GEORGE AGED 38 YEARS S/O. GEORGE JOSEPH, GEEMANGALAM, PACHA CHEKKIDIKADU- POST, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA - DISTRICT, PIN - 689573
Cherish George vs Union of India (Rep. by the Secretary to Government ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-10-2024
658 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.6232 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/S: CHERISH GEORGE AGED 38 YEARS S/O. GEORGE JOSEPH, GEEMANGALAM, PACHA CHEKKIDIKADU- POST, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA - DISTRICT, PIN - 689573
Merin Cherish vs Shibu M. Stanly
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-19-2022
AUGUST 2022 / 28TH SRAVANA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPDIV 280/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONER/S: MERIN CHERISH AGED 32 YEARSD/O.A.J.CHERIAN, AYROOTHARA HOUSE, CHALAPALLY P.O, EZHUMATTUR VILLAGE, MALLAPPALLY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT., PIN - 689586 BY ADVS.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cherish Raj vs Aanandakrishnan.S, I.P.S
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-18-2022
2022 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.08.2022 IN WP(C) NO.25779/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS/PETIITONERS IN WP(C): 1 CHERISH RAJ AGED 43 YEARS S/O. RAJAPPAN PILLAI, 2 SRIDEVI R.PILLAI AGED 61 YEARS W/O. RAJAPPAN PILLAI, 3 RENJIMA
Cherish George vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-06-2019
/ 15TH PHALGUNA, 1940 Crl.MC.No. 552 of 2019 CRIME NO. 142/2016 OF Edathua Police Station , Alappuzha PETITIONER/S:1 CHERISH GEORGE AGED 33 YEARS S/O GEORGE JOSEPH,GEEMANGALAM THOTTUVELIL HOUSE,CHEKKIDIKKADU.P.O, THAKAZHI VILLAGE,KUTTANADU TALUK, 2 SOPHIAMMA JOSEPH, AGED 59 YEARS
Sri Jey Cherish and Co. Ltd. Vs. the State of Madras
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-01-1959
Reported in: (1960)IIMLJ147; [1960]11STC353(Mad)
ORDERRajagopalan, J.1. The disputed turnover was Rs. 1,05,955-11-2. It was common ground that this represented the price at which the assessee purchased untanned hides and skins. The further findings were that these untanned hides and skins...
Regency Hotels Private Limited Vs. Cherish Investments Private Limited ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-2008
Reported in: 2008(6)ALLMR721; 2008(4)ARBLR301(Bom); 2008(5)BomCR49
as follows:The scope of the arbitration will be limited as follows:Viz. to determine as to how much shareholding Cherish is entitled to (if any) in Regency on account of payments made by Cherish to the Shareholders of
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free