Charmed - Judgment Search Results

Areyanda Charm an a at Sabu, Son of Late DevaihA. Vs. the State of Kar ...

Court: Karnataka

1) The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.28/2012 of Rural Police Station. Madikeri. registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8 & 20(a)(b) of N.D.P.S. Act.2) According to the case of the prosecution, this...

Charms Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. and 5 Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(69)ECC542

1. These six appeals involve consideration of common issue and are therefore disposed of by this order.2. The appeals E/1085, 1189 and 1221/95 are against the orders of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune and...

Murray Vs. the Charming Betsey

Court: US Supreme Court

Murray v. The Charming Betsey - 6 U.S. 64 (1804) U.S. Supreme Court Murray v. The Charming Betsey, 6 U.S. 2 Cranch

Gujarat S.T. Driver Conductor Traffic Staff Association Vs. Gsrtc

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2000)4GLR376

of the employees of different corporations namely Ahmedabad Telecom District, Gujarat Rural Industrial Marketing Corporation Ltd. and Gujarat Charm Udhyog Development Corporation Ltd. and from the said pay slip, he has tried to submit that inspite of

Southern Roadways Ltd., Represented by Its Secretary and anr. Vs. C. P ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1989)2MLJ497

Any such order, even if passed, will be a nullity, (vide the decisions reported in Kiran Singh v. Charm Paswan : [1955]1SCR117 . and R. Venkataswami v. South India Viscose Ltd. Coimbatore : AIR1985Mad257 So, these revision

Ram Pat and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(8)Scale145; AIR2009SC2847; JT2009(7)SC579; (2009)7SCC614; 2009AIRSCW4337

a stray or a casual act of possession would not amount to settled possession. There is no special charm or magic in the word 'settled possession' nor is it a ritualistic formula which can be confined in

D.S. Grewal Vs. Vimmi Joshi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(1)SC400; 2009(I)OLR(SC)308; 2009(1)SCALE54; (2009)2SCC210; 2009(2)SLJ351(SC):2009AIRSCW21232009(2)LHSC994

beauty is so well awarded in one single person as in you. You are no doubt, a very charming and gorgeous woman, beautiful and attractive. You are very magnetic. Always elegantly drew-up, you look very stylist and

Sanjay Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC1368; 2007CriLJ1801; I(2007)DMC788SC; [2007(3)JCR6(SC)]; 2007(4)SCALE178; 2007AIRSCW1710; (2007)3SCC(Cri)1; 2007LawHerald(SC)966; 2007(2)KCCR1311.

felt resentful as she married the appellant of her own will. She further expressed that she felt no charm in leading such life.7. Another letter (Ex.29) is dated 26.7.1994 i.e. about five months before the incident of

State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Pastor P. Raju

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC2825; 102(2006)CLT612(SC); 2006CriLJ4045; JT2006(7)SC165; 2006(5)KarLJ337; 2006(3)KLT830(SC); RLW2007(1)SC200; 2006(7)SCALE503; (2006)6SCC728

thereafter sending it for inquiry and report under Section 202. It was observed that there is no special charm or any magical formula in the expression 'taking cognizance' which merely means judicial application of the mind of

Rame Gowda (D) by Lrs. Vs. M. Varadappa Naidu (D) by Lrs. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(2)ALD31(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(2)CHN33; 2003(10)SCALE950; (2004)1SCC769; MANU/SC/1044/2003

or without any attempt at concealment by the trespasser. The phrase settled possession does not carry any special charm or magic in it nor is it a ritualistic formula which can be confined in a strait-jacket. An