Charanjit Lamba V Army - Judgment Search Results
Bandhu Oraon Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
here that the scope of interference in service matters is no more res integra. In the case of Charanjit Lamba v. Army Southern Command, (2010) 11 SCC314in paragraph 19 and 20 the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held as under … order of punishment imposed upon an employee the Hon’ble Supreme Court in paragraph -12 of the case of Charanjit Lamba v. Army Southern Command(supra) held as under :“12. The doctrine of proportionality which Lord Diplock saw as a future possibility
Bandhu Oraon Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-08-2017
here that the scope of interference in service matters is no more res integra. In the case of Charanjit Lamba v. Army Southern Command, (2010) 11 SCC314in paragraph 19 and 20 the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held as under … order of punishment imposed upon an employee the Hon’ble Supreme Court in paragraph -12 of the case of Charanjit Lamba v. Army Southern Command(supra) held as under :“12. The doctrine of proportionality which Lord Diplock saw as a future possibility
Sebastian K. Antony Kavumbhagom Vs. Manager, St.Albert's College, Erna ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
Reported in: 2012(2)KLT133(SN)(C.No.129)
Hari Babu - JT 2008 (4) SC 51; Punjab and Sindh Bank v. Daya Singh(2010) 11 SCC 233; Charanjit Lamba v. Army Southern Command - (2010) 11 SCC 314). There is no scope for any generosity or sympathy with regard
18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.A.Th Vs. the Union of India, Through the Departme
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
of the punishment and scope of interference of this Court with the punishment imposed on the petitioner. In Charanjit Lamba v. Army Southern Command the Supreme Court has laid down that the Court can interfere with the punishment only when
G.M. Gouzaming Kuki @ G.M. Kuki Vs. UOI and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2015
court should not interfere". 16. Recent decisions too, have reiterated the principle of proportionality. It was observed in Charanjit Lamba v. Commanding Officer, Southern Command 2010 (11) SCC 314 that: the punishment imposed upon a delinquent should commensurate to … It was pointed out that one colleague died immediately in the ambush. The Petitioner was admitted to the Army hospital in Srinagar for several weeks, and he proceeded on Medical leave for two months. During this leave,
Deputy Commissioner,kvs and ors Vs. J.Hussain
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
drill while undergoing rigorous imprisonment. This Court held that the punishment imposed upon him was not disproportionate. In Charanjit Lamba vs. Commanding Officer (2010) 11 SCC314where the appellant who was holding the rank of Major in the Indian … the appellant who was holding the rank of Major in the Indian Army had exhibited dishonesty in making a false claim of transport charges of … CIVIL APPEAL No.8948/2013 (arising out of the SLP (Civil) No.18271 of 2006) Deputy Commissioner, KVS & Ors. ….Appellants Vs. J.Hussain ….Respondent JUDGMENT A.K.SIKRI,J.1. Leave granted.2. The respondent herein was served with a charge memo dated 2/3rd August
S. Elhance Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2012
On the issue of false claim, the learned counsel for the respondent has relied upon a case of Charanjit Lamba Vs. Commanding Officer, Army Southern Command, (2010) 22 SCC 314@317, wherein the Supreme Court has held as under:Having … 09.2012 Judgment delivered on:06 .12.2012 S. ELHANCE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi and Ms. Anjali Chaturvedi, Advocates. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.
Monika, Ex-L/CT/GD, Vs The Union of India,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
Constable Sunil Kumar, Civil Appeal No. 219 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) No. 7645 of 2018), and (2) Charanjit Lamba vs. Commanding Officer, Army Southern Command and Others, reported in (2010) 11 SCC 314.9. The arguments advanced by … THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR Monika, Ex-L/CT/GD No.120801352 D/o.Sh.Bijender Singh Sanwar Village Post Office Bound Kalan Police Station Tehsil-Ch.Dadri Bhiwani District Haryana- 127 042. ...PetitionerVs. 1.The Union of India Ministry
Dilip Mukherjee Vs. the State of West Bengal and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
dismissed his original application. Ms. Bhattacharya, in support of her contentions, cites the decision in the case of Charanjit Lamba Versus Commanding officer, Army Southern Command and others reported in (2010) 11 Supreme Court Cases 314. In Charanjit … therefore, justified in dismissing him from service. She submits that there is no scope to take a lenient view in favour of the writ petitioner in exercise of the power of judicial review by this Court. She
Lokesh Nag Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
the court should not interfere. (See Mithilesh Singh vs. Union of India reported in (2003) 3 SCC 309, Charanjit Lamba Vs. Army Southern Command reported in (2010) 11 SCC 314) Thus, I do not find any merit in … Harish Tandon, J. A short but very interesting point is involved in this writ petition relating to the competence and jurisdiction of the high court
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free