Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Chandry - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 2023

Chandri vs the Union of India, Represented by Secretary, Ministry of R ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-31-2023

FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 10853 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 CHANDRI AGED 55 YEARS, W/O SHREEDHARAN, THIRUMANGALATH SHARMI NIVAS, MUTTUNGAL,WEST POST, VADAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRIC., PIN - 673106. 2


Aug 26 1994

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chandri and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-26-1994

Reported in: 1996ACJ3; (1997)IIILLJ159Raj

R.S. Kejriwal, J.1. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, Bundi, vide his award dated February 3, 1993, awarded a sum of Rs. 1,16,784/- to the claimants along with penalty and interest, under Section 4A of the Workmen's Compensation...


Apr 10 2025

Chandri.C.V. vs Adv.Navaneeth Krishnan

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Apr-10-2025

OF 2009 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 26/07/2008 IN CC NO.536 OF 2007 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ,THALASSERY APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT: CHANDRI.C.V., D/O C.K.KUNHIRAMAN, SHAKKEER QUARTERS, (PO) VARAM,, THALASSERY. BY ADV SMT.K.V.BHADRA KUMARI RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND STATE:1 ADV.NAVANEETH KRISHNAN S/O.V.V.PRABHAKARAN, THEENDAKKARA


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 11 2023

Chandri K vs the Director of Public Instruction

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-11-2023

ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA, 1944 PETITIONER: CHANDRI K W/O THANKACHAN, MADHAVA MANDIRAM, MANGALAM, THRIKKUNNAPPUZHA - 690515, ALAPPUZHA SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.PAUL C THOMAS RESPONDENTS:1 THE DIRECTOR


Jul 07 2014

Ram Chandri Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-07-2014

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-16445 of 2014 Date of Decision:- 07.07.2014 Ram Chandri .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR Present: Mr.H.S.Gharuan, Advocate, for the petitioner.


Sep 18 2023

Chandri M .C vs Thalassery Primary Co-Operative Agricultural & Rural D ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-18-2023

NINAN MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 27TH BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 11666 OF 2022 PETITIONER: CHANDRI M .C, AGED 43 YEARS, W/O MUKESH, MANATHANDE CHUNDAYAL,CHENDAYAD POST, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670692 BY ADV K.SIMOD


Mar 05 2001

Smt. Chandri Das Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Mar-05-2001

Reported in: 2001CriLJ2455

ORDERP.K. Tripathy, J.1. Heard.2. This revision is disposed of at the stage of hearing on admission in the following manner.3. Informant in S.T. No. 14/12 of 96 and S.T. No. 6/2 of 1997 of the Court...


Jan 09 1989

T. Chandri and ors. Vs. Kambrath Kanarakutty

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-09-1989

Reported in: AIR1990Ker122

P.K. Shamauddin, J.1. The legal representatives of the plaintiff in O.S. No, 5 of 1974 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge of Kozhi-kode are the appellants in the second appeal.2. The suit was...


Jun 25 1926

Chandri Ayal Abdul Haji Sajan Vs. Abdul Karim Lalbhai Shet

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-25-1926

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR1360

Amberson Marten, Kt., C.J.1. The plaintiff-respondent brought this suit to recover on a mortgage bond, dated August 22, 1922, the sum of Rs. 16,000 for principal and Rs. 2,500 for interest 'at 15 per cent., making...


Sep 17 1924

Emperor Vs. Chandri Bawoo

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-17-1924

Reported in: (1924)26BOMLR1225

Marten, J.1. We have been engaged for over an hour and a quarter in considering the question whether an alleged prostitute has been rightly fined Rs. 5. But the apparent minor nature of the offence is...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial