Challenger - Judgment Search Results

Shini, (Mentally Challenged) vs Sanoj,

Court: Kerala

1942 OP (FC).No.225 OF 2020 AGAINST THE ORDER IN O.P.No.519/2019 OF FAMILY COURT, IRINJALAKUDA ------- PETITIONER/S:1 SHINI, (MENTALLY CHALLENGED) D/O.NEENDI VEETTIL GANESAN, MANALOOR DESOM, VILLAGE AND P.O., EMS ROAD, THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680617, REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND CLOSE

Challenge in This Appeal Is to the Award Dated March 22 Vs. Sheela and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

appellants. Mr.Satpal Dhamija, Advocate for Mr.Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for for respondent No.3 - Insurance Company. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) Challenge in this appeal is to the Award dated March 22, 2011 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Palwal

The Petitioner Challenges the Notifications Dated Vs. Laxmi NaraIn ... ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Mohinder 2014.02.21 15:39 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.1631 of 2014 [2].The petitioner challenges the notifications dated 25.05.2010 (Annexure P-1) and 24.05.2011 (Annexure P-2) issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the

Challenging the Impugned Award the Appellants Have Took Vs. Smt. Malda ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

are the same, for convenience and clarity rest of the facts are taken from RFA No.1219 of 1997.6. Challenging the impugned Award, the appellants have took up a stand that the landowners neither produced aksajra nor any

Challenging This Order in the Revision Petition Plea of the Vs. Suders ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

be examined. In short, the court felt that this evidence is essential for just decision of the case.2. Challenging this order in the revision petition, plea of the petitioners is that when this witness had been given

Challenger Computers. Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Trade and Ta ...

Court: Delhi

Matched in: Parties Challenger Computers. Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi and Others

Challenge Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and ors.

Court: DRAT Kolkata

Institutions Act, 1993 hereinafter referred to as the Act, by the instant petition, the petitioners have sought to challenge the Order No. 13 dated 11.8.2000 passed by the Presiding Officer, DRT, Calcutta, on several grounds.2. A preliminary

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Challenger Rubbers (P) Ltd.,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2006)(108)ECC597

Matched in: Parties The Commissioner of Central Vs. Challenger Rubbers (P) Ltd.,

U.S. Vs. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedure

Court: US Supreme Court

U.S. v. STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURE - 409 U.S. 922 (1973) U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURE

Farmers' Friend Mfg. Co. Vs. Challenge Corn Planter Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Farmers' Friend Mfg. Co. v. Challenge Corn Planter Co. - 128 U.S. 506 (1888) U.S. Supreme Court Farmers' Friend Mfg. Co. v. Challenge Corn