From

Cha - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Jun 26 2012

Cha Bagan Mazdoor Union Vs. Official Liquidator

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-26-2012

HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION IN THE MATTER OF: M/S.TEA TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(IN LIQUIDATION) AND CHA BAGAN MAZDOOR UNION Versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date :26. h June, 2012. Appearance:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 1958

Cachar Cha Sramik Union Vs. Manager, Martycherra Tea Estate and anr.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Jun-06-1958

is in the following terms :'The respondents are accordingly directed to pay the above sum to the Cachar Cha Sramik Union who are the applicants in this case, within a period of 2 months from the date

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 1961

Cachar Cha Sramik Union and anr. Vs. Chandighat Tea Estate and ors.

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: May-19-1961

are slightly different and they are as follows.3. Civil Rule No. 111 of 1960 filed by the Oachar Cha Sramik Union and one Atul Chandra Ankara is in regard to the minimum wages claimed by Atul Chandra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Jul 31 2003

Service Bureau (Cha) Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2003

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC502

1. Challenge in this appeal is against the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (I & G), New Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2004

Service Bureau Cha Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-08-2004

Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT325TriDel

Matched in: Parties Service Bureau Cha Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1943

Abdullabhoy Esoofally Chas Vs. Akbarally SamsuddIn Raja

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-14-1943

Reported in: AIR1944Bom93; (1943)45BOMLR1102

in. that case also cited cases to show that actions affecting real property were strictly local in their character and could not be tried in this country when they affected foreign countries. He further submitted that no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1949

Chas. J. Webb Sons and Co. Inc. Philadelphia Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-21-1949

Reported in: [1950]18ITR33(P& H)

where the person entitled to the income, profits or gains is not resident in British India, shall be chargeable to income-tax either in his name or in the name of his agent, and in the latter case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 1923