Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central laws extension to jammu and kashmir act 1968 Sorted by: old Page 6 of about 464 results (0.154 seconds)

Jul 06 1983 (HC)

Raghunath Behera Vs. Revenue Divisional Commissioner (Southern Divisio ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1983Ori281; 56(1983)CLT209

..... and prays for quashing of annexure-8, the order dt. 25-8-1981, conferring fishery rights on the opposite party no. 4 jalandhar behera, a retired fishery extension officer, with knowledge and experience in pisciculture and a member of the scheduled castes and in addition, a fisherman by caste, in respect of 'dhoba-bandho' fishery ..... an infraction of the inviolable provision of the constitution.'this principle has been followed by this court in air 1979 orissa 13 hrudananda patra v. revenue divisional commissioner, central division, cuttack.this case is, however, not one where a monopoly right has been conferred on the opposite party no. 4. the fishery rights were conferred ..... all 139, yadav medical stores, allahabad v. state of u. p., that since the functions of the state have multiplied enormously, the ambit of rule of law has also been enlarged. even in the realm of administrative action, some safeguards and restrictions have been evolved by the courts and infringement of the same has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1983 (HC)

Binny Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1984(16)ELT52(Kar)

..... the petitioner has contended that it was not open to the superintendent to collect the cess, if any, prior to the extension of the 1923 act to the erstwhile state of mysore. 12. sri k. shivashankar bhat, learned central government senior standing counsel appearing for the respondents has urged that this plea that had not been specifically urged in the ..... that behalf for the improvement and development of the growing, marketing and manufacture of cotton in india. 6. the part b state laws of 1951 (central act 3 of 1951) (hereinafter referred to as the part-b state laws act) that came into force on 1-4-1951, extended the 1923 act to all part-b states except the state of ..... hearing does not involve any investigation of facts and is a plea that falls under the principle of inherent want of jurisdiction and in any event a pure question of law, that calls for examination on merits. i, therefore, propose to examine the same on merits. 14. the 1923 act enacted by the then indian legislature did not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1983 (HC)

Binny Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1985Kant50

..... the petitioner has contended that it was not open to the superintendent to collect the cess, if any prior to the extension of the 1923 act to the erstwhile state of mysore.12. sri. k. shivashankar bhat, learned central government senior standing counsel appearing for the respondent has urged that this plea that had not been specifically urged in the petitions ..... behalf for the improvement and development of the growing, marketing and manufacture of cotton in india.6. the. part-b state laws of 1951 (central act 3 of 1951) here in after referred to as the part-b state laws act) that came into force on 1-4-195 1, extended the 1923 act to all part-b states except the ..... hearing does not involve any investigation of facts and is a plea that falls under the principle of inherent want of jurisdiction and in any event a pure question of law, that calls for examination on merits. i, therefore, propose to examine the same in merits.14. the 1923 act enacted by the then indian legislature did not and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1983 (HC)

Cadar Constructions Vs. Tara Tiles

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom258; 1984(2)BomCR530; 1984MhLJ603

..... contained in the civil courts act of 1965. moreover, one also cannot forget that subsequently a material change has taken place in the law. 8. the parliament has passed a law called 'the high court at bombay (extension of jurisdiction to goa. daman and diu) act. 1981' in this act 'appointed day' has been defined to mean the date ..... have already made a reference to regulation no. 12 of 1962 and the fact that it provided for the extension of certain laws mentioned in the schedule to that regulation to this union territory. we have also mentioned that the laws were to come into force on such dates which would be fixed by the lieutenant governor of the union ..... on which the said act comes into force. the central government by a notification has fixed 30th of october 1982 as the appointed day. section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1983 (HC)

Daya Shanker Singh Vs. the Conservator of Forest (Southern Zone) and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1984All188

..... while deciding the earlier writ petition no. 1054 of 1982, adopted this course and it bad directed the conservator to decide the question of extension in accordance with law and the directions contained in the judgment. the conservator of forest refused to grant ex-tension on extraneous considerations disregarding the directions of this ..... , 1982, addressed to the chief conservator of forest is set aside. the conservator of forest shall decide the application of the petitioners for extension expeditiously in accordance with law uninfluenced by the government order dated oct. 21, 1981, and the note dated september 1, 1981.'prior to the issue of the aforesaid ..... order dated may 19, 1983, quashed the order of the state government and directed the conservator of forest to decide the petitioners' application for extension in accordance with law uninfluenced by the government order dated october 21, 1981, and the note dated september 1, 1981. the conservator of forest thereupon considered the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1984 (HC)

C.V. Raman and ors. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas126(Mad); (1984)IILLJ34Mad

..... of its annual net profits before declaring a dividend.' 48. sections 40, 49 and 50 also are relevant. these various provisions suggest immense or extensive control by the central government. the learned counsel cites the decision in ramiah v. state bank of india, : (1963)iillj304mad , in this connection and also the ..... state of liability, obligation. under adv. - (2) lower in authority, position, power, etc., subordinate. (3) held in control or restraint, used predicatively. boviar's law dictionary - 'under' - the terms sometimes used in its literal sense of 'below in position' but more frequently in its secondary meaning of 'inferior' or 'subordinate'. the compact ..... public servant charging its functions shall actunder the indian penal code. on business principles of publicinterest.18. dissolution : no provisionof law relating to winding up of 16. (1) the central office ofcorporations shall apply to a new the state bank shall be atbank and no corresponding new bank bombay.shall be placed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1984 (HC)

C.V. Raman Vs. the Management of Bank of India, Regional Office, South ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1985)2MLJ439

..... out of its annual net profits before declaring a dividend.35. sections 40, 49 and 50 also are relevant. these various provisions suggest immense or extensive control by the central government. the learned counsel cites the decision in ramaiah v. state bank of india : (1963)iillj304mad , in this connection and also the decision ..... the 'state' and are, therefore, 'state' within the meaning of article 12. the fact that these corporations have independent personalities in the eye of law does not mean that they are not subject to the control of government or that they are not instrumentalities of the government. these corporations are instrumentalities or ..... state bank may declare a dividendafter making provision for the requirements mentioned in the section. therate of dividend shall be determined by the central board.section18. dissolution: no provision of law relating to winding up of corporationsshall apply to a new bank and no corresponding new bank shall be placed inliquidation save by order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1984 (HC)

Jagdish Chander Gupta Vs. the Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1986J& K1

..... act of 1977 (1920 a. d.) act no. xi of 1977. the said act was repealed subsequently and companies act of 1956 by means of the jammu, and kashmir (extension of laws) act, 1956 was made applicable to the state of jammu and kashmir and respondent no. 1 came to be regulated by the companies act of 1956. it was provided in ..... act. government company for the purpose of the companies act means any company in which not less than 51% of the paid up share capital is held by the central government or by any state government or governments or partly by the state government and partly by one or more state governments and includes a company which is a subsidiary ..... is one in which the government has majority of shares. the entire paid up share capital of the respondent bank is not held by the state government or by the central government or by both the governments. merely because the respondent bank is a government company it cannot be held that it is either a government corporation or an industry .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1985 (HC)

State of Sikkim Vs. Gyalpo Tshering Tamang and ors.

Court : Sikkim

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1423

..... of the union of india by and under the constitution, that could not, by itself, result in automatic extension of the all-india enactments to those states and the part b states (laws) act, 1951 had to be passed for extending central acts to those states. the very provisions of clauses (k) and (n) of article 371f, inserted by ..... (n) to extend by proper notifications enactments operating in other states to the state of sikkim. the provisions of clause (n) of article 371f, authorising such extension of laws operating in the rest of india, would have been meaningless and without any purpose if all the earlier all-india enactments were to rush into the state of ..... been referred to with approval by the supreme court in central bank of india v. their workmen : [1960]1scr200 . 'a declaratory act means to declare the law or to declare that which has always been the law and there having been doubts which have arisen, parliament declares what the law is and enacts that it shall continue what it then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1985 (HC)

Sukhdev Singh Dhindsa and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1985CriLJ1739

..... commission was set up in 1955.19. the first law commission presented its report (the fourteenth report) on the reform of judicial administration, both civil and criminal, in 1958; ..... possible. in addition, local amendments were made by state legislatures, of which the most important were those made to bring about separation of the judiciary from the executive. finding that the code of criminal procedure, 1898 needed some comprehensive revision, central law ..... code had been amended from time to time by various acts of the central and state legislatures. the more important of these were the amendments brought about by central legislation in 1923 and 1955. the amendments of 1955 were extensive and were intended to simplify procedures and speed up trials as far as .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //