Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central laws extension to jammu and kashmir act 1968 Page 1 of about 464 results (0.473 seconds)

National Insurance Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1989J& K56

..... . mr. j.p. singh, learned counsel for the plaintiff-respondent 1, however, submitted that the motor vehicles act, 1939 was applied to the state of jammu and kashmir by the central laws (extension) act, 1968 and there is nothing to show that the subsequent amendments could become automatically applicable to jammu and kashmir and since section 110(1) was amended in 1969, to ..... been extended to the state of jammu and kashmir till the promulgation of the central laws (extension to jammu and kashmir) act, 1968. extension act, according to the preamble, was enacted to provide 'for the extension of certain central laws to the state of jammu and kashmir'. by virtue of section 2 of the extension act which came into force on 15-8-1968, the acts mentioned in .....

SaIn Dass Vs. Controller General, Jammu (Director Food and Supplies) a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1981J& K40

..... was issued in samvat 2000; and (4) that the essential commodities act 1955 (for brevity, 'the act'), having been extended to the state by virtue of central laws (extension to jammu and kashmir) act no. 25, 1968 the ordinance stands repealed by force of section 16 of the act. that apart, validity of clause 3 of the ..... act was extended to the state of jammu and kashmir along with many other central acts by act no. 25, central laws (extension to jammu and kashmir) act, 1968. although the act itself repeals the corresponding laws enforced in the state, a provision was made in the central laws (extension to jammu and kashmir) act, 1968, in section 5 of that act. ..... section 5 provides:'if immediately before commencement of this act, there in force in the state of jammu and kashmir any law corresponding to any act extending to that state, that law shall save as otherwise expressly provided .....

Smt. Leelabai Gajanan Pansare and ors. Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR774; JT2008(9)SC551; 2008(11)SCALE391; (2008)9SCC720; 2008(2)LC1155(SC); 2008(6)Supreme89

..... of jammu and kashmir, or any part thereof, before the commencement of the jammu and kashmir (extension of laws) act, 1956 (62 of 1956), in so far as banking, insurance and financial corporations are concerned, and before the commencement of the central laws (extension to jammu and kashmir) act, 1968 (25 of 1968) insofar as other corporations are concerned; ..... particular the resolution of the state ministers for housing of 1992 and the national model law which has been circulated by the central government in 1992. we are not expressing any opinion on the provisions of the said model law but as the same has been drafted and circulated amongst all the states after due ..... does not include- (a) a corporation sole; (b) a co-operative society registered under any law relating to co-operative societies; and (c) any other body corporate (not being a company as defined in this act) which the central government may, by notification in the official gazette, specify in this behalf.(10) 'company' means .....

LandT Finance Limited Vs. M/s. Saumya Mining Ltd and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... state of jammu and kashmir, or any part thereof, before the commencement of the jammu and kashmir (extension of laws) act, 1956 (62 of 1956). in so far as banking, insurance and financial corporations are concerned, and before the commencement of the central laws (extension to jammu and kashmir) act, 1968 (25 of 1968) in so far as other corporations are concerned ..... in any case, the provisions of the constitution is supreme over all sentiment, may be of the state government or the central government. if the scheme of the constitution provides for making room for operation of laws made by the parliament for a particular class of companies over the state legislature, its effect cannot be diluted nor can be ..... respect of such matter if any, enacted by the legislature of any state shall be subject to the law made by the parliament and a state act is always subject to central act. it is held that section 45-q of the reserve bank of india act makes it clear that the provisions of chapter iii-b .....

Rajesh Gupta and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ80

..... to jammu & kashmir) order, 1954 and as amended by the constitution (application to jammu & kashmir) amendment order, 1965, under entry 35 of the concurrent list, enacted the central laws (extension to jammu & kashmir) act, 1968. by section 2 of the said act, the acts mentioned in the schedule and all rules, orders and regulations made thereunder were extended to ..... reserved for consideration of the president and receives his assent. whether there is an apparent repugnance or conflict between central and state laws occupying the same field and cannot operate harmoniously in each case the court has to examine whether the provisions occupy the same filed with respect ..... proper test would be whether effect can be given to the provisions of both the laws or whether both the laws can stand together. section 213 it self made the distinction of the powers exercisable by the state government and the central government in working the provisions of the act. it is the state government to create .....

D. Gobaloussamy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Secre ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1969)2MLJ62

..... both the above methods had to be adopted. several of the central acts extended, like the official trustees act, 1913 and the motor vehicles act, in their first section indicating ..... by reference like the act now under consideration or central act xxx of 1965 which extended the code of civil procedure and the arbitration act to goa, daman and diu. the latter method, in effect and substance, amends the extent clause of the original act. in the central laws ((extension to jammu and kashmir) act xxv of 1968 ..... particular with reference to the three stages or phases of that development. for an appreciation of the argument now presented before us, on the central issue of the vires of the pondicherry (extension of laws) act, 1968 (xxvi of 1968), it is not necessary to traverse that ground again, but it is essential to recapitulate one or two .....

University of Kashmir and ors. Vs. Dr. Mohd. YasIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC238; 1974LabIC181; (1974)ILLJ109SC; (1974)3SCC546; [1974]2SCR169

..... of probation expired on december 14, 1968, but the vice-chancellor extended it for one more year by order dated november 11, 1968. this extension was confirmed by the meeting of the central council of the university at its meeting dated june 26, 1969. but at the same meeting it was resolved by the ..... of factum valet. we cannot countenance the alleged continuance of the respondent in the university campus as tantamount to regular service under the university with the sanction of law. in short, the respondent has no presentable case against the direction to quit.13. even so, there are certain disquieting features in this case. the additional ..... act, 2005 (samvat year) created the university of jammu and kashmir. several years later, the present respondent joined the university as a lecturer on contract basis, the law that governed his services being the provisions of that act and the statutes framed thereunder. subsequently, the jammu and kashmir university act, 1965, was passed which, while .....

J.K. Cigarettes Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1988(18)ECC34,1989(39)ELT355(J& K)

..... face of it, does not bear closer scrutiny. the expression 'make law' and 'extend law' have the same connotation in areas where the law comes into existence, for the purpose of its application to any area, for the first time. the expression 'make law' would include 'extending law' and, therefore, the extension of the central act of 1944, to the state of jammu and kashmir by the ..... taxation laws act, 1954, would, for the purpose of the said article amount to 'making law' for the state. even under article 370(l)(b), the competence to issue .....

Sardar Ali. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1982CriLJ644

..... adulteration act, 1954 has been extended to the state of jammu and kashmir with effect from 26-1-1972. the central rules were extended to the state with effect from 10-10-1972. prior to the extension of the central laws, the state had in force its own set of rules which were promulgated in 1963. with a view to ..... , amended or repealed by the rules made under the act. this provision would, therefore, save such of the state rules in force immediately before the extension of the central act or the central rules which are not inconsistent with or repugnant to the provisions of the act.7. it is not disputed that the prevention of food adulteration rules, ..... , learned counsel appearing for the municipality, have on the other hand, urged that the state rules oi 1963 continue to remain in force evfen after the extension of the central rules and the state rules stand repealed only to the extent to which they are inconsistent with or repugnant to the provisions of the prevention of food adulteration .....

Raja Mohammad HussaIn Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2004J& K16,2003(3)JKJ639

..... the basis of the court order. his stay after the expiry of the visa and at least the expiry of period for which extension was sought, cannot be said to be under any authority of law, but for the court order. the claim of the petitioner that he being a state subject has aright to stay in srinagar, ..... of thepassport as conclusive proof of the loss of citizenship would notarise.' 18. nothing having been said about involuntary nature of acquisition of pakistani citizenship, jurisdiction of central government under section 9(2) of the citizenship act cannot be involved as no such question falls for determination in this case.19. the ratio of the said ..... sub-section shall apply to a citizen of india who, during any war in which india may be engaged, voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country, until the central government otherwise directs.(2) if any question arises as to whether, when or how any person has acquired the citizenship of another country, it shall bedetermined by such .....