Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1974Ori115
..... the court can take judicial notice of the fact that sambalpur district is a surplus district as regards rice and there was extensive smuggling from the district to the adjacent states such as bihar and central provinces.'16. the purpose of annexure 8 is to confer some beneficial facilities to the needy harijans. it does not say ..... formal evidence of matters with which, men of ordinary intelligence are acquainted, whether in general or in relation to natural phenomenons and whether in peace or war (halsbury's laws of england vol. 15. 3rd ed. p. 3991. there is a wide range of things of which the court can take judicial notice, viz., historical facts, ..... covered by the legislation are left out, would not render the legislation discriminatory. what is true of legislation is also true of an administrative or executive order. law is well settled that administrative or executive orders or actions can come under the periphery of judicial scrutiny under writ prerogative. in the instant case there is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1983Ori281; 56(1983)CLT209
..... and prays for quashing of annexure-8, the order dt. 25-8-1981, conferring fishery rights on the opposite party no. 4 jalandhar behera, a retired fishery extension officer, with knowledge and experience in pisciculture and a member of the scheduled castes and in addition, a fisherman by caste, in respect of 'dhoba-bandho' fishery ..... an infraction of the inviolable provision of the constitution.'this principle has been followed by this court in air 1979 orissa 13 hrudananda patra v. revenue divisional commissioner, central division, cuttack.this case is, however, not one where a monopoly right has been conferred on the opposite party no. 4. the fishery rights were conferred ..... all 139, yadav medical stores, allahabad v. state of u. p., that since the functions of the state have multiplied enormously, the ambit of rule of law has also been enlarged. even in the realm of administrative action, some safeguards and restrictions have been evolved by the courts and infringement of the same has been .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : 2000CriLJ1214; 2000(I)OLR301
..... government or by the central government would vitiate the order of detention.9. in the present case, from the counter ..... section 8, make it clear that the representation made by the detenu to the central government has to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible without any unreasonable delay. these provisions are, in fact, an extension of the principle contained in article 22(5) of the constitution. law is well settled that any delay in disposing of the representation either by the state .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : 93(2002)CLT103
..... held that the appellant could not pay the deficit court-lees in the circumstances beyond his control, or under unavoidable circumstances and that there was sufficient cause for extension of time to make good the deficit court-fees.16. in view of the discussions made above, misc. case no. 751 of 2000 is liable to be ..... december, 2000 , but paid the same on 10.4.2001 without pressing for consideration of its application for condonation of delay and without filing another application for further extension of time to pay the deficit court-fees. before admission of the appeal, two applications, one for appointment of a third party receiver and the other for injunction ..... did not pay the required court-fees for any circumstances beyond his control or under unavoidable circumstances and whether it has been able to show sufficient cause for extension of time to make good the deficit court -fees.13. as indicated in the earlier paragraphs, the appellant prayed for eight weeks time to pay the deficit .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : 1967CriLJ1423
..... the position whether or not pakistan is at war with, or committing external aggression against india. this is undoubtedly an extension of the powers of the central government in respect of persons whom the central government can now intern under the amendment : undoubtedly it is a new power, effective from september 6, 1965 to ..... internment order of 6th september 1965. such subsequently extended power must be expressly delegated to the state government in order that the state govern-ment might lawfully exercise it for internment of any national of pakistan. the present case therefore is a clearly distinguishable from the cases relied on by the learned government ..... legal effect of the matters mentioned in the state's additional counter affidavit, which factually are of somewhat controversial nature, particularly in the eye of international law. that apart, these ace matters outside the scope of the application before us.18. in the ultimate analysis of the position discussed above, the order .....
Tag this Judgment!