Court : Sikkim
Reported in : 1985CriLJ1423
..... of the union of india by and under the constitution, that could not, by itself, result in automatic extension of the all-india enactments to those states and the part b states (laws) act, 1951 had to be passed for extending central acts to those states. the very provisions of clauses (k) and (n) of article 371f, inserted by ..... (n) to extend by proper notifications enactments operating in other states to the state of sikkim. the provisions of clause (n) of article 371f, authorising such extension of laws operating in the rest of india, would have been meaningless and without any purpose if all the earlier all-india enactments were to rush into the state of ..... been referred to with approval by the supreme court in central bank of india v. their workmen : [1960]1scr200 . 'a declaratory act means to declare the law or to declare that which has always been the law and there having been doubts which have arisen, parliament declares what the law is and enacts that it shall continue what it then .....
Tag this Judgment!