Cellular - Judgment Search Results
Cellular Operators Asscn. of India and Ors Vs. Telecom Regulatory Auth ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-30-2015
certain observations.2. The factual matrix of the case is as follows: Appellant Nos.2 to 10 are private GSM cellular operators and the first appellant is their Association. They have been issued licences by the Central Government, Department
Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-11-2016
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5017 OF2016(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (CIVIL) NO.6521 OF2016 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..APPELLANTS VERSUS TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL
Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-29-2021
COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. No.64307 of 2021 In Civil Appeal Nos.1045-1052 of 2011 VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD. Appellant VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN Respondent WITH I.A. No.64291 of 2021 In C.A. No.10676/2013.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bharti Cellular Ltd.now Bharti Airtel Ld Vs. Assistant C.i.t Circle 57
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-2024
REPORTABLE2024INSC148IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7257 OF2011BHARTI CELLULAR LIMITED (NOW BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED) ..... A PPELLANT VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE57 KOLKATA AND ANOTHER
Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Union of India (U ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: (2003)3SCC186; [2002]SUPP5SCR222
decision of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal']. The appellants are Cellular Mobile Service Providers (CMSPs) and the private respondents are the Fixed Service Providers (FSPs). The appellants approached the
Bharti Cellular Limited . Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-05-2010
India in terms of the Licence Agreement executed between the parties.2. The appellant-company holds a licence to provide cellular mobile telephone services for Delhi Metro area. The Licence Agreement executed between the appellant on the one hand
Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-26-1994
Reported in: AIR1996SC11; [1994]Supp2SCR122
of Telecommunications, Government of India, invited tenders from Indian Companies with a view to license the operation of Cellular Mobile Telephone Service' in four metropolitan cities of India, namely, Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta and Madras. Cellular mobile telephone
Idea Cellular Infrastructure Services Ltd Through Authorized Signatory ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-17-2015
Officer, Chatra Nagar Panchayat, P.O., P.S. & Dist- Chatra … … Respondents WITH W.P.(C) 6635 of 2014 Ideal Cellular Infrastructure Services Ltd registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Suman Towers, Plot no.
Bharti Cellular Limited Vs. Department of Tele-communicaitons
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
1. The Petitioner, Bharti Cellular limited (‘BCL’) [earlier known as Bharti Mobile Limited (‘BML’)], has in this petition under Section 34 of the
Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Ni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free