Cello - Judgment Search Results
Cello thermoware Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs (Export), Mumbai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-27-2010
Per: P.G. Chacko 1. The appellant had exported their final product (plastic-insulated wares hot pot with stainless steel liners) in discharge of export obligation in relation to the raw materials imported earlier by them and cleared...
M/S. Cello thermoware Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-26-2001
Matched in: Parties M/S. Cello thermoware Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Cello Household Appliances Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-21-2001
application is for waiver of deposit of duty of Rs. 28.65 lakhs, and penalty of equal amount of Cello Household Appliances Ltd., the assessee, and penalties under Rule 209A of Rs. 5 lakhs on P.J. Sharma, its
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cello Household Appliances Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-12-2003
Reported in: (2003)(111)LC712Tri(Mum.)bai
eligibility to exemption contained in entry 25 of the table to notification 15/94 of two articles manufactured by Cello Household appliances Pvt. Ltd., the assessee, and liability to penalty on it an on Pradeep Rathod, its director.2.
Cello Plastotech Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-16-2003
Reported in: (2004)(163)ELT76Tri(Mum.)bai
Matched in: Parties Cello Plastotech Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Cello thermoware Ltd., Shri P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-07-2005
Reported in: (2005)(191)ELT625Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Appellants, M/s Cello Thermoware Ltd (herein after referred to as CTL for short), an assessee, under the Central Excise Act 1944,
Cello House Hold Appliances Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Dec-06-2006
pens, pencils. Similarly Shri Mukesh Bhatt, a consumer has stated in his affidavit that he has using the cello Singapore Shelf by placing the same on top of his table for keeping stationery items like pens, U-Pins
Faber-Castell Aktiengesellschaft and Another Vs. Cello Pens Pvt. Ltd. ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
crayons in quite luscious colours, of a distinctive type and in unique packaging. Faber-Castell says that the Defendant, Cello Pens Pvt Ltd (âCelloâ?), has not merely copied every single aspect of the Faber-Castell product âdown to the
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cello Writing Instruments and Container ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-2009
Reported in: [2009]319ITR63(Bom)
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cello Writing Instruments and Containers P. Ltd.
State of Kerala Vs. Cello Household Appliances (Pvt.) Ltd.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-21-2002
Reported in: [2004]138STC621(Ker)
T.A. No. 274 of 1999. The respondent herein is the appellant in the said appeal. The respondent M/s. Cello Household Appliances (Pvt.) Ltd., Mumbai consigned 2790 American serving sets at the rate of Rs. 53 per set
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free