Ce - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Ce and St (Ltu) LupIn Ltd. Vs. LupIn Ltd. Commissioner ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

applications filed by M/s. Lupin Ltd., against order-in-appeal No SB/20-25/LTU/MUM/2009 dated 30.11.2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) of Central Excise and Service Tax, LTU, Mumbai. Against the said order they have filed a composite appeal within the

Cc And Ce And St Noida Vs. M/s Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11330 of 2018 CC and CE and ST, NOIDA ...Appellant(s) Versus M/s Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd. ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Feeling

Ce Construction Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Intertoll Ics India (P) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Judgment Reserved on : April 13, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : April 20, 2015 + FAO (OS) 490/2014 CE CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.Deepak Khosla, Advocate with Mr.Ajay Marwah, Advocate versus INTERTOLL ICS INDIA

Ce Info Systems Pvt Ltd and Anr vs.gas Authority of India Ltd

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 807/2017 and CM Nos. 3726/2017 & 18236/2017 CE INFO SYSTEMS PVT LTD AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Shaurya Sahay and Mr Chetan Joshi, Advocates. versus

dy.ce/c (Northern Railway) Jammu Tawi vs.m/s Bumi Geo Engineering Ltd

Court: Delhi

the Arbitral Tribunal to strictly enforce Clause 12.1.1 of the Contract Agreement regarding recovery of excess steel and cement at double the prevailing procurement cost at the time of last issue plus 5% freight.3. As far as

Jothikumar Ce vs Santhosh Koshy Thomas

Court: Kerala

7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 02.12.2021IN WP(C) NO.16124 OF 2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER:JOTHIKUMAR CE AGED 62 YEARS JOTHSNA, VURA-74A, TC 76/2255(3), PILLAVILAKOM LANE, ARASUMMOODU, ANAYARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695029, PIN - MAHESH CHANDRAN C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM)

Cc and Ce Vs. Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2001(96)LC9(Gujarat)

subject to transferring the refund amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. GSFC preferred appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad, and by order dated 9.12.1998, confirmed the order dated 17.8.1995 passed by the

Cc and Ce, Bbsr-i Vs. M/S. Mangalam Timber Products

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

1. After rejecting the stay petition of the Revenue, I take up the appeal itself with the consent of both the sides duly represented by Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, ld.SDR and Shri R.S. Bajaj, ld.Chartered Accountant.2. The...

Cc and Ce, Bbsr-i Vs. M/S. Cosboard Indus. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2001)(136)ELT784Tri(Kol.)kata

Armoured Cables could not be considered as capital goods within the definition as existed under rule 57Q(1) of Central Excise Rules, 1944.3. I find that the decisions relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals) are in respect of

Cc and Ce, Bbsr-i Vs. M/S. Nalco

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

1. The respondent company is a Public Sector Undertaking. Accordingly, the Revenue is required to produce a Certificate of Clearance from the Committee of Secretaries in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court in the