Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cattle trespass act 1966 chapter i preliminary Page 6 of about 499 results (0.119 seconds)

Aug 10 1999 (SC)

The Belsund Sugar Co. Ltd. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC3125; 1999(4)ARBLR502(SC); 1999(3)BLJR2191; JT1999(5)SC422; 1999(4)SCALE516; (1999)9SCC620; [1999]Supp1SCR146

..... the impact of sugarcane (control) order on the general sweep of the karnataka agricultural produce market (regulation) act, 1966. point no. 3 was framed in this connection, which reads as under:whether the 'act' as amended by act 17 of 1980 in so far it provides for regulation of marketing of sugarcane is unconstitutional as its marketing ..... fund to facilitate the farmers to go and from the villages;](ix) the planting and rearing of trees, and making arrangements for providing to the persons and cattle coming to a market and like purposes;(x) to (xii) xx xx xx xx xxx all these provisions clearly indicate that once the transaction of sale ..... look at these relevant special statutory provisions.69. in this connection, our attention was invited to four orders framed under section 3 of the essential commodities act pertaining to sugar:1. sugar (control) order, 1966;2. sugar (packing & marking) order, 1970;3. sugar (restriction on movement) order, 1970;4. levy sugar supply (control) order, 1979. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1994 (HC)

C.K. Rajan Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1994Ker179

..... the government, in their statement dated 2-12-1993 have only stated that regarding the encorachment of devaswom properties, the suggestions may be accepted and the lands trespassed upon should be got vacated. regarding construction of the statue 'guruvayur kesavan', it is stated that those who are responsible should be dealt with by the ..... call them for cross-examination. the further question whether the appointment of the commissioners falls within the terms of order xlvi of the supreme court rules, 1966 is of technical significance only, because there was inherent power in the court, in the particular circumstances of thiscase to take that action.'amarendra nath sen ..... accordance with the dittam or scale of expenditure fixed for the temple and the subordinate temples under section 51 of the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act, 1951 (madras act xix of 1951); (b) to provide facilities for the proper performance of worship by the worshippers; (c) to ensure the safe custody of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 1971 (HC)

Narayanan Damodaran and ors. Vs. Narayana Panicker Parameswara Panicke ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1971Ker314

..... ) (fb) a full bench of this court considering the validity of sections 7 and 7-b (1) of the act, recognised that the benefit of the section might be available to rank trespassers or land grabbers as well as to bona fide trespassers and that the conferment of fixity on the latter might well amount to agrarian reform, but felt that the subject ..... unconstitutional as they do not get the protective mantle of article 31a of the constitution. and i strike them down.19. the result is that a. s. no. 542 of 1966 and o. p. no. 5360 of 1970 are dismissed and c. m. a. no. 124 of 1970 is allowed and the order of remand set aside. since the question raised ..... particular cases in which it could be applied is not what is contemplated by severability in application: that is no severability at all.13. now. a. s. no. 542 of 1966 is an appeal against a second appeal, and that, in execution. the appellant was the second defendant in a suit of 1122 m. e. (1946-47) for redemption of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2005 (SC)

Sarbananda Sonowal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2920; JT2005(6)SC79; (2005)5SCC665

..... is further averred that as on 31st march, 2004, 519391 number of inquiries were completed by the tribunals under the foreigners act to detect those foreigners who came into assam during the period 1st january, 1966 to 24th march, 1971 and 29189 persons were declared as foreigners and their names were deleted from the electoral rolls. this shows ..... , they are entitled to certain immediate rights necessary to the enjoyment of ordinary private life. thus, the bangladeshi nationals who have illegally crossed the border and have trespassed into assam or are living in other parts of the country have no legal right of any kind to remain in india and they are liable to be deported ..... the constitution is not maintainable. we are unable to accept the submission made. it is the foremost duty of the central government to protect its borders and prevent trespass by foreign nationals. article 51-a(d) of the constitution says that it shall be the duty of every citizen of india to defend the country and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1999 (HC)

The Tufanialonga Tea Co. Ltd., Calcutta and anr. Vs. State of Tripura ...

Court : Guwahati

..... field and if it does so, the state legislation would be ultra vires. in that case, the supreme court struck down the karnataka agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1966, in so far as it levied market fee in respect of tobacco because the said provision for levying market fee directly collided with the tobacco board ..... 246(2) and 246(3) of the constitution, the fact that it is also a legislation affecting the tea industry in the state of tripura and incidentally trespass into the field covered under entry 52 of list i of the 7th schedule of the constitution reserved to the parliament will not invalidate the said ordinance and the ..... by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest, and imported goods of the same kind as much products;(b) foodstuffs, including edible oilseeds and oils;(c) cattle fodder, including oilcakes and other concentrates;(d) raw cotton, whether ginned or unginned, and cotton seed; and(e) raw jute.' under article 246(1) of the constitution quoted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1969 (SC)

Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1969SC783; (1970)3SCC400; [1969]3SCR254

..... [1892] a.c. 491 the judicial committee, affirming the decision of the supreme court of newfoundland, observed that the plea of act of state raised in an action for trespass against the captain of a british fishery vessel who was authorised by the commissioners of the admiralty to superintend the execution of an agreement ..... such a task as forming part of their duties.... whatever other government functions were required with respect to these outlying grazing grounds, on which herds of cattle were from time to time shepherded, were apparently undertaken by sind. thus, the births, deaths and epidemics occurring there were recorded by the taluka office ..... was no question of demarcation of a disputed boundary : it was a case of pure cession of indian territory. ram kishore sen and ors. case : [1966]1scr430 : [1966]1scr430 which dealt, among others, with the cession of 500 acres of chiiahati village related to transfer of territory which though temporarily under indian administration had never .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1988 (SC)

Upadhyaya Hargovind Devshanker Vs. Dhirendrasinh Virbhadrasinhji Solan ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1988SC915; (1988)1GLR690(SC); JT1988(1)SC350; 1988(1)SCALE342; (1988)2SCC1; [1988]2SCR1043; 1988(1)LC671(SC)

..... court under article 226 of the constitution and this court under article 136 of the constitution.13. the above situation continued till the act was further amended by the representation of the people (amendment) act, 1966. by this amendment the power to try an election petition was entrusted to the high court. the new section 80a which was introduced ..... than the place of seat of the high court.14. a new section was substituted in the place of the former section 86 of the act by the amendment made in the year 1966. the relevant part of new section 86 reads thus:86. trial of election petitions -(1) the high court shall dismiss an election petition which ..... into the act reads as follows:80-a. high court to try election petitions: (1) the court having jurisdiction to try an election petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1991 (SC)

Sub-committee of Judicial Accountability Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC320; JT1991(6)SC184; 1991(2)SCALE844; (1991)4SCC699; [1991]Supp2SCR1

..... the object of the power is to effectuate a legal right....in punjab sikh regular motor service, moudhapura v. the regional transport authority, raipur and anr., : [1966]2scr221 , this court referring to the word 'may' in rule 63 (a) in central provinces and berar motor vehicles rules, 1940, observed :.on behalf ..... number of judges, who can be removed only by the process of impeachment, congress has enacted the judicial councils reform and judicial conduct and disability act of 1980 whereby the judicial councils have been explicitly empowered to receive complaints about judicial conduct opaquely described as 'prejudicial to the effective and expeditious ..... initiated against mr. justice vasta of the supreme court of queensland and for that purpose, the queensland legislature enacted the parliamentary (judges) commission of inquiry act, 1988 whereby a commission comprised of three retired judges respectively of the high court of australia, supreme court of victoria and the supreme court of new .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 1974 (SC)

Samsher Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC2192; (1974)IILLJ465SC; (1974)2SCC831; [1975]1SCR814; 1975(1)SLJ1(SC)

..... cases. in some cases the rule of guidance has been stated to be 'the substances of the matter' and the 'foundation' of the order. when does 'motive' trespass into 'foundation'? when do we lift the voil of form to touch the 'substance'? when the court says so. these 'freudian' frontiers obviously fail in the work- ..... on 22 march, 1967 the chief secretary issued a notice to him substantially repeating the same charges which had been communicated by the registrar on 15 december, 1966 and asked the appellant to show cause as to why his services should not be terminated as he was found unsuitable for the job. the appellant gave an ..... a vast array of other powers exercisable by the president--to mention only a few appointment of judges; article 124 & 217, appointment of committees of official languages act, article 344, appointment of commissions to investigate conditions of backward classes; article 340, appointment of special officer for scheduled castes and tribes; article 338, exercise of his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1980 (HC)

Nematullah Vs. Mohd. Zikriya

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 19(1981)DLT55; 1981(2)DRJ22

..... presented and thereforee it must be held that the appeal is barred by time. (mr. ishwar sahai in support of his argument relies upon suraj parkash bali v. parmanand, 1966 d.l.t. 407 wherein a similar application for exemption from the filing of the certified copy of the order of the court of the first instance was filed but ..... desirable to decide the appeal on merits also. mr. ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant, has raised one question. he says that under section 14(l)(e) of the act it is not necessary for the landlord to prove that the premises were let for residential purposes. he argues that the landlord has failed to prove the same. his argument ..... eviction of the appellant vide order dated 1/4/1976. the tribunal held that the respondent was entitled to an order of eviction under section 14(l)(e) of the act. (2) mr. ishwar sahai, learned counsel for the respondent has taken a preliminary objection that the appeal is barred by time. as i have sataed earlier, the judgment under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //