Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cattle trespass act 1966 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 1 of about 36 results (0.092 seconds)

Nematullah Vs. Mohd. Zikriya

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 19(1981)DLT55; 1981(2)DRJ22

..... presented and thereforee it must be held that the appeal is barred by time. (mr. ishwar sahai in support of his argument relies upon suraj parkash bali v. parmanand, 1966 d.l.t. 407 wherein a similar application for exemption from the filing of the certified copy of the order of the court of the first instance was filed but ..... desirable to decide the appeal on merits also. mr. ahmed, learned counsel for the appellant, has raised one question. he says that under section 14(l)(e) of the act it is not necessary for the landlord to prove that the premises were let for residential purposes. he argues that the landlord has failed to prove the same. his argument ..... eviction of the appellant vide order dated 1/4/1976. the tribunal held that the respondent was entitled to an order of eviction under section 14(l)(e) of the act. (2) mr. ishwar sahai, learned counsel for the respondent has taken a preliminary objection that the appeal is barred by time. as i have sataed earlier, the judgment under .....

Nathu Ram Mathura Prashad and anr. Vs. Mamleshwar Phashad and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 7(1971)DLT100

..... this suit (points 2 and 3 mentioned above) reference may straight be made to the proviso to clause (a) of section 4 of the delhi land reforms (amendment) act, 1966, which enables a suit to this effect being filed but on a limited ground. the relevant part of the section reads as under :4.'validation of action taken under section ..... trial court was in error in holding that possession of their clients, after the expiry of the initial period of 25 years reserved in the lease was that of trespassers and, thereforee, a decree for possession and recovery of mesne profits could be passed against them. as for the declaration that the order of the revenue assistant was ..... 00 against the two appellants, messrs nathu ram mathura prshad and permeshwar pershad the appellants in r.f.a. 22 d of 1963, hereafter called the lessees and messrs delhi cattle breeding farms ltd., appellants in r. f. a. 205 d of 1962, hereafter called the sub-tenants.(2) on november 18. 1959, the plaintiffs filed this suit against .....

Shri Kishan Vs. Mahabir Singh and Two ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi575

..... including, inter alia, garden, grounds and out-houses appertaining to such building. further, as observed by sarkar j, in lakhmi chand v. kauran devi, : [1966]2scr544 , the slum areas act is not concerned with the relations between landlords and tenants as such, and it does not purport to interfere directly with the ordinary contractual right of landlords and ..... judgment, the landlord preferred a second appeal, s.a.o. no. 216-d of 1962, to the high court. the said second appeal was dismissed on october 25, 1966, by r. s. narula j. (as the learned judge then was). in the second appeal also, the finding concerning subletting was not questioned, and only the finding of ..... other words, the person in occupation of the premises in question may be either a lawful tenant or an unlawful trespasser. thus, the definition of 'occupier' in the act appears to include a lawful or unlawful sub-tenant. yet, even this extended or wide definition of the expression 'occupier' has been utilised only in the .....

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi387

..... order was promulgated in order to achieve the purpose set out in the act, the government was not considered to have trespassed upon a field which does not properly belong to them. the notified order under sec. 18aa if promulgated to achieve the avowed purpose of the act, will thereforee, stand protected against absence of natural justice.(92) in ..... rule could possibly have been invoked. the company was one of the 12 sick textile mills in gujarat which had to be closed down in 1966 and 1968. in may 1969, government passed an order appointing a committee for investigation into the affairs of the company under section 15 of the ..... and as an effective instrument to ensure the executive action is just and fair. it has saved innumerable persons and institutions from the onslaught of authoritarian regimes, arbitrary acts and injustice and preserved the priceless liberties, freedoms, property, status and reputations from illegal jeopardy. it is of the highest importance that such a golden rule is .....

Sheila Devi and ors. Vs. Kishan Lal Kalra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi491

..... to pursue that matter at that stage because the said rules, though prima facie applicable to delhi by virtue of the provisions in section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966, were not determinative of the questions that have arisen, because the said rules did not lay down the manner of determination or the criterion in respect of all types of ..... the high court of judicature at lahore which are still applicable to the union territory of delhi by virtue of the provisions in section. 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966.(8) it was stated in the order of reference that there was some controversy before the learned judge on the question as to the applicability to the union territory of ..... partnership deed, dated 19.4.1967. (4)that the defendants be directed to render true and full accounts of m/s kishan lal & company for the period since 1.7.1966. kishan lal wine merchant since 9.10.1969 and kishan lal wine merchants (p) ltd. from 16.5.1971 onwards till date, and the said defendants be fixed with .....

Home Solutions Retails (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... carnatic co. ltd., etc., 1969 (2) scc 55, the challenge was to the madras urban land tax act, 1966. a contention was raised that the impunged act fell in schedule vii, list i, entry 86 as the impugned act was, both in form and substance, taxation of capital and, hence, beyond the competence of the state legislature ..... legislative field it would follow that other fields in the legislative lists must be construed to exclude this field so that there is no possibility of legislative trespass. further, with respect to the exclusive legislative powers of the parliament and the states, their lordships have held thus: "49. under the three lists ..... . 22. mr. a.s. chandhiok, learned additional solicitor general, countering the aforesaid submissions, has contended that by virtue of the amendment incorporated by the finance act, 2010, the levy is on the very activity of renting, leasing, letting, licensing of the immovable property or permitting the immovable property through any arrangement whatsoever .....

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... cal) .elaborating on the points as to how the appropriate authority should appreciate the principles of valuation and how the expects them to act, learned senior counsel referred to cwt v. v. c. ramachandran : [1966]60itr103(kar) . in that case the court took the view that the appropriate method of valuation is to capitalise the annual rent ..... . air india v. nergesh meerza : (1981)iillj314sc .8. hari chand sarda v. mizo district council : [1967]1scr1012 .9. hari krishna bhargav v. union of india : [1966]59itr243(sc) .he also submitted that arbitrariness in state action is vocative of article 14 of the constitution of india, when we are governed by rule of law, which should ..... high courts, had stuck to its stand without taking into account the well-settled principles in fixing the fair market value.in krishnakumar agarwal v. appropriate authority [1966] 217 itr 274 the division bench of the gujarat high court consisting of rajesh balia and m. b. shah jj. rendered the judgment on september 19, .....

Sreeranganathan K.P., Sreepadam Vadakkkekkottaram (H) and Others Vs. t ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... officer in his letter to the tahsildar has explicitly stated that the aforesaid k.j. abraham had illegally reclaimed 3.56 hectares of land and has also trespassed into 8.87 acres of government land. it is further stated in the above letter that the reclamation of the nilams/paddy fields is done by mining ..... mosquitoes, leeches, pythons and in the locality skin affections in the people have made life very difficult. there are many instances of leeches entering the nostrils of cattle resulting in their death. if the project complies with the condition in environment clearance, it could be executed whereby water logging can be removed, the remaining paddy ..... the effect that construction of the airport is in violation of the provisions of the kerala conservation of paddy and wet land act, 2008, kerala land reforms act, 1963, environment protection act, 1986, land acquisition act etc are false and denied in toto. in any event, the present tribunal is not concerned with alleged violations of state .....

Kusum Kumria and Others Vs. Pharma Venture (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court : Delhi

..... the defendant from parking any vehicle in the lawn. after having filed the suit, the defendant contends that the plaintiffs illegally and unauthorizedly trespassed into the ground floor room which was owned and in possession of late shri s.p. kumria and had been handed over by ..... the suit observing that he had a right to file a suit for partition at any time he pleases. 136. on 14th october, 1966, rao sold his half share in the cinema to n.c. subramaniam and sons who, in turn, on 19th january, 1970, sold ..... marlas bearing khasra no. 99/4/2, khatauni no. 204 and khewat no. 100 through a registered sale deed, dated 19.5.1966 to bhartu. ram sarup, claiming to be a co-sharer, in the said khewat, filed a suit for possession of the said land ..... favour of the defendant by asserting their rights as a co-sharer, under section 15(1)(b), fourthly, of the punjab preemption act, 1913 (punjab act 1 of 1913), as by an earlier sale in their favour, by harinder singh co-sharer, they had become co-sharers in .....

Mrs. Kailash Suneja and ors. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1998)145CTR(Del)560

..... & ors. : (1981)iillj314sc .8. hari chand sarda vs. mizo district council & anr. : [1967]1scr1012 .9. hari krishna bhargav vs. union of india & anr. : [1966]59itr243(sc) .137. he also submitted that arbitrariness in state action is vocative of art. 14 of the constitution of india when we are governed by rule of law which ..... such transactions are governed by business prudence and are not influenced by any extraneous considerations. exception, however, is made only under s. 269ud of the it act where such transactions are made between the relatives on account of natural love and affection'.the appropriate authority had completely ignored the realities of situation.101. regarding ..... on the point as to how the appropriate authority should appreciate the principles of valuation and how the law expects them to act, the learned senior counsel referred to cwt vs. v. c. ramachandran : [1966]60itr103(kar) . in that case the court took the view that the appropriate method of valuation is to capitalise the .....