Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1975Ori219
..... to his share. the suit was filed on 29-10-1965. the case arises out of an area in the ex-gangpur state wherein the act was brought into force on 1-4-1966. mohanti, j. held that as the bhogra lands vested in the state no further action in civil court was maintainable and the jurisdiction of the ..... aside.(ii) by the settlement plaintiffs have acquired title to the b schedule lands and are entitled to declaration of title and recovery of possession from the defendants who trespassed thereon.(iii) defendants acquired title to the a schedule lands by the settlement and plaintiffs cannot evict them.(iv) c schedule lands are the raiyati lands of the ..... plaintiffs. they were in their possession. defendants are trespassers and are liable to be evicted therefrom.45. in the result, the judgments of the courts below are set aside regarding a schedule lands and confirmed in respect of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : AIR1953Ori185
..... owner of the soil; and if we think it should be laid down as a general rule that, if he who makes the improvement is not a mere trespasser, but is in possession under any bona fide title or claim of title, he is entitled either to remove the materials, restoring the land to the state in ..... possession of residential buildings, or buildings which are under use for other personal purposes, such as for instance those used for storing personal grains or for keeping personal cattle or implements as also buildings used for factories or mills or for purposes of trade, manufacture, or commerce. mines which are under the actual direct operation and ..... or mills for the purpose of trade, manufacture, or commerce or used for storing grains or keeping cattle or implements for the purpose of agriculture. these will be hereinafter called 'personal buildings' for convenience (section 6(1)). 33. the general scheme of the act is to leave to the intermediary, buildings of categories (2) and (3) on the footing .....
Tag this Judgment!