Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cattle trespass act 1966 chapter i preliminary Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 20 results (0.288 seconds)

Bonam Krishnamurthy and anr. Vs. Mirza Nallaparaju Venkata Prabhakara ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1984AP374

..... jurisdiction to entertain the suit and also application as sections 92 and 93 c. p. c. are repealed by section 110 of the a. p. charitable and endowments act, 1966. the application for granting leave under section 92 c. p. c. was heard and the court below held that the petitioners plaintiffs cannot invoke section 92 c. p ..... the 4th defendant is said to have collected funds and constructed the choultry in 1947 and was managing the same. about six years ago the defendants appear to have trespassed on the premises under the pretext of getting it repaired. but the son of the 4th defendant filed an application before asst. commissioner. hr. & c. e. ..... ouster of applicability. the amendments contemplated thereunder are not susceptible to be stretched to preclusion or untouchability of any of the provisions of c. p. c. the endowments act being a special enactment clearly fretted out the coverage of . section 92 c. p. c. this aspect can be considered from another perspective. section 110 is concerned .....

Kommisetty Nammalwar and Co. Rep. by Its Proprietor Kommisetty Nammalw ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT431:AIR2009NOC2482(A.P)(F.B).

..... notification reads as under.notificationin exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 4 of the andhra pradesh (agricultural produce and livestock) markets act, 1966 (act 16 of 1966) and in supercession of all the g.os., issued on the subject of agricultural produce, livestock and products of livestock and flowers, the governor of andhra ..... fee. hides and skins when identified as agricultural produce, merely because they are treated from carcass, they are not exempt from levy of market fee as the cattle was already subjected to levy of market fee. ghee and butter are by products from milk but when milk, 'ghee' and butter are notified as agricultural produce ..... fee. hides and skins when identified as agricultural produce, merely because they are treated from carcass, they are not exempt from levy of market fee as the cattle was already subjected to levy of market fee. ghee and butter are by-products from milk but when milk, ghee and butter are notified as agricultural produce .....

Barla Rami Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD752; 2008(3)ALT336

..... (3) supreme 49 is of no help to the petitioners either. in that case the supreme court was considering section 37 of the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966 which contains an embargo on changing development plan involving change of its character. in that connection, the supreme court considered the terms 'modification' or 'change' and in ..... other cases which may not come within the meaning of the preceding clauses, for example, a case where the tenant's occupation has ceased as a result of trespass by a third party. the legislature, in our opinion, intended to cover all possible cases of vacancy occurring due to any reasons whatsoever. hence, far from ..... the master plan, while limiting the power of the authority to make minor modifications under the act.84. in pune municipal corporation (2004) 10 scc 796 the scope of section 37 of the maharashtra regional and town planning act, 1966 fell for consideration of the supreme court. under the said provision where a modification of any .....

M/S.Jagathi Publications Ltd., Rep. by Y.Eshwara Prasad Reddy Vs. Cent ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... . act, omission:- the word act denotes as well as a series of acts as a single act; the word, omission denotes as well a series of omissions as a single omission. criminal conspiracy has ..... criminal procedure, 1973 (the code, for brevity) which is as follows:- "offence" means any act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force and includes any act in respect of which a complaint may be made under section 20 of the cattle-trespass act, 1871 (1 of 1871). section 33 of ipc is as follows. 33 ..... the third charge-sheet was filed on 07.05.2012 in the same first information report. the special court constituted under the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 act (hereinafter referred to as special court) has taken cognizance of the first charge sheet on 27.04.2012 and issued summons to the accused and others. the .....

K.P. HussaIn Reddy and ors. Vs. Executive Engineer, M.i. Division and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD43; 2003(3)ALT143

..... . the principles that emerge from the decided cases in india and britain are as under:(i) torts like assault, battery, and false imprisonment which are trespass to person by police officer and investigating agencies which are not authorised under law are constitutional torts. (ii) awarding of compensation is public law remedy and ..... (supra) and maharaj v. attorney general of trinidad and tobago (supra) as well as article 9(5) of international covenant on civil and political rights, 1966. while holding that the public law remedy for compensation has to be more readily available when invoked by 'have nots' who are not possessed of wherewithal for ..... of the statute.29. whether the owners of the land, whose property is acquired are entitled to claim any other benefits and facilities which are not provided for under the act this question was considered in chandragauda ramgonda patil v. state of maharashtra, : (1996)6scc405 , state of kerala v. bhaskaran pillai, : air1997sc2703 , koppula narasiah v .....

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Rep. by Executive Officer Vs. T. Venkat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(6)ALT472

..... of late sri annamacharya. they further asserted that their predecessors and themselves are in possession of the suit properties with absolute rights since generations and the plaintiff trespassed into item nos. 1 and 2 of the plaint schedule lands. but, in a partition suit between the 10th defendant and his brothers covered by o. ..... revenue department under sub-section (4).inams deputy tahsildar, chittoor, under sub-section (4) of section 3 of the andhra inams (abolition and conversion into ryotwari act, 1956)(andhra act xxxvii of 1956), that the land specified below:(iv) is an inam land(v) is in ryotwari vil(vi) is not held by an institution scheduledistrict : ..... a committee headed by a commissioner. the act of 1951 was repealed by another act 30 of 1987 and later the a.p. state legislature passed the endowments act in 1966 after repealing the act of 1951 and subsequently the act 30 of 1987 was brought into force by repealing the act of 1966.5. several nandanavanams (gardens) in tirumala .....

M. Babu Rao and ors. Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD582; 2005(4)ALT327; [2005]126CompCas708(AP); [2005]63SCL339(AP)

..... the karnataka itc case (44 supra), the majority had held that the provisions of the karnataka agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1966 are invalid as repugnant to the union legislation - the tobacco board act, 1975 and that the 'tobacco' should be excluded from the schedule of the karnataka law. sabyasachi mukharji, j recorded the ..... a certificate for recovery of arrears due to a financing bank. the provisions of section 71(1) (after excision of the invalid words) would not trespass into unauthorised legislative territory.128. by way of abundant caution and to avoid any misconception, we clarify and declare that it is only those adjudications, ..... exclusive and these entries must be construed with clarity and precision so as to maintain such exclusivity and a construction of a taxation entry that might lead to overlapping or trespass must be avoided... hoechst pharamceuticals ltd. v. state of bihar : [1985]154itr64(sc) ; state of w.b. v. kesoram industries ltd. : [2004] .....

Rani Sundarammani Vs. Govt. of A.P., Revenue Department and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD184; 2006(4)ALT374

..... land in an estate other than private land but does not include-(a) beds and bunds of tanks and of supply, drainage surplus or irrigation channels;(b) threshing floor, cattle-stands, village-sites, and other lands situated in any estate which are set apart for the common use of the villagers;land granted on service tenure either free of rent ..... , are that punganoor zamin estate was notified on 07-09-1950 and was finally taken over by the government, under the a.p. estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) act (act 26 of 1948), on 22-07-1952. when the zamin was notified and taken over a representation was submitted by the zamindar to the government on 17-11-1952 stating ..... was a big block of forest, there were no ridges or any manner of demarcation showing enjoyment of each individual, that the same was the position on 11-06-1966 when location work was taken up by the ex-circle office, chittoor and taluk surveyor along with the tahsildar, punganur and that it was found not to be ryoti .....

N. Srihari and ors. Vs. N. Prakash and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD370

..... plaint 'a' schedule therein consists of immovable properties both agricultural lands and house properties. plaint 'b' schedule consists of two motor vehicles and buffaloes and other cattle. balarajaiah goud, defendant no. 1, defendant nos. 3 to 6, kausalya (second wife of balarajaiah goud) and chandramma are defendants to the said suit. ..... the behest of victim of such coercion or undue influence. but, a contract vitiated by fraud suffers from incurable defect. sections 13 - 18 of the indian contract act, 1872 define/describe 'consent', 'free consent', 'coercion'', 'undue influence', 'fraud', and 'misrepresentation'. as this court finds that the allegations of fraud and coercion ..... builders and financiers (supra) the supreme court laid down as under:it has been held by this court in bharat singh v. bhagirathi, : [1966]1scr606 that an admission is substantive evidence of the fact admitted and that admissions duly proved are 'admissible evidence irrespective of whether the party making them .....

Kalasami Venkanna and ors. Vs. the Secretary, Govt. of A.P. Forest Dep ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT705

..... , except at such season and subject to such conditions as the divisional forest officer may, from time to time, specify in this behalf;(ii) trespasses, pastures cattle or allows cattle to trespass;(iii) causes any damage, either wilfully or negligently in felling or cutting any tree or dragging any timber;(iv) ...........(x)......(d) abets any of the ..... question not being a reserved forest, the petitioners cannot be prosecuted. section 20 so far as it is material reads as follows:-20. penalties for trespass of damage in reserved forest and acts prohibited in such forest:-(1) any person who-(a) contravenes the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 7;(b ..... acts specified in clause s (a), (b) and (c), shall, in addition to such compensation for damages caused to the forest as the court may .....