Carton - Judgment Search Results

Balaji Cartons, Rep. By its Partner V. Nagaraj, Madurai District Vs. T ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

the petitioner an opportunity to submit reply and a personal hearing, pass orders according to law.) 1. M/s.Balaji Cartons rep. by its Partner, V.Nagaraj has filed the present writ petition questioning the correctness of the order passed

Dhruvco Carton Industries vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

ITS KARTA SH. SURINDER KUMAR GUPTA COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADED TAX & ANR. ........ Petitioner versus DHRUVCO CARTON INDUSTRIES COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ANR......... RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 9920/2016, C.M. APPL.39476/2016 + W.P.(C) 9922/2016 ........

Colour Cartons Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(67)ELT71(Bom)

Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners are seeking quashing of order dated February 5, 1983, the copy of which is annexed at Exhibit 'H' to the petition. By...

Orient Cartons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)57TTJ(Mumbai)302

ORDERM. V. R. PRASAD, AM :This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A), dt. 7th June, 1995, for the asst. yr. 1992-93 in which he confirmed, inter alia, the addition of...

Corru-carton (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Corru-carton (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Box and Carton India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

is working since 1985 and were availing the benefit of SSI exemption. The other unit is Box & Carton (India) Pvt. Ltd. and the same is manufacturing the goods since 1996 and clearing the goods at appropriate

Perfect Cartons Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(12)LC76Tri(Delhi)

have been imposed on M/s.Perfect Agencies are not relevant for our purpose in this appeal by M/s. Perfect Cartons. No appeal of M/s. Perfect Agencies is before us. (i) unity of ownership of both the appellant as

Colour Cartons Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)(76)ELT129Tri(Mum.)bai

Excise, Bombay-Ill has rejected your request under Rule 56B of Central Excise Rules, 1944 for sending semi-finished printed cartons for further process, as the processes proposed to be carried out at the job workers' [premises] amount to

Kartik Cartons and Varnishings Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1995)LC113Tri(Chennai)

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the order of the Collector (Appeals), Madras. The learned Collector (Appeals) in the impugned order allowed the appeal of the Revenue filed under Section 35E(4) of...

Cartons Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)LC142Tri(Delhi)

duty and imposing penalty of Rs. 50,000/-.2. Appellant, manufacturer of printed labels and wrappers commenced manufacture of printed cartons in the financial year 1983-84, availing benefit of the exemption under Notification No. 83/83. This notification provided full